安全专业外语外文翻译.docxVIP

附录Application of Gas Content Test Data to the Evaluation of Gas Emission and Hazards During Longwall Development and Extraction R. J. Williams GeoGAS Systems Pty. Ltd. Abstract This paper compares aspects of fast and slow desorption methods and attempts to provide guidelines for their application and associated sampling strategies.The importance of determining Total Desorbable Gas Content (Q1+Q2+Q3) as opposed to Desorbable Gas Content (Q1+Q2) is highlighted. The former involves partial destruction of bore core, but provides considerably more accurate data. It is also more amenable for use in gas reservoir simulation modelling.Fast desorption techniques are shown to have considerable advantages over slow desorption techniques. These are, greater accuracy in gas composition assessment, the potential to rationalise sampling, fast turnaround involving fewer resources, finalization of geological logs and early application of the data. Q3 can still be differentiated. A more sensitive indicator of gas desorption rate is incorporated in GeoGAS’s fast desorption method (GeoGAS Desorption Rate Index). Gas reservoir size determination is facilitated by a sampling strategy where relationships between gas content and gas composition with depth and mineral matter are defined. This enables indirect assignment of gas content to those gas bearing strata not directly tested. The importance of testing/assigning gas contents to inferior coaly horizons is indicated. Gas content test results are basic input into any mining application. An overview of its application to modelling gas emission is given. Statistical analysis of the data enables modelling inputs and outputs to be expressed as means and probability distributions. IntroductionGas content testing has become a routine part of most surface borehole exploration programs for underground coal mining. The gas content test data are basic input into costed approaches to gas, ventilation and spontaneous combustion control. With the