两种根管治疗法治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的临床分析.docVIP

精品论文 参考文献 两种根管治疗法治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的临床分析 遵义市红花岗区延安路街道办事处社区卫生服务中心 贵州遵义 563000 摘要：目的：观察并比较两种不同根管法治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的临床效果。方法：选取2014年1月-2015年1月于我院治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的72例患者作为研究对象，随机分成采用一次性根管治疗的观察组（36例）与采用常规多次根管治疗的对照组（36例），观察并对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果：经一次性根管治疗的观察组在治疗1周后，疼痛率为38.89%；常规多次根管治疗的对照组治疗1周后，疼痛率为55.56%。观察组疼痛率显著低于对照组（plt;0.05）。治疗1年后，观察组治疗成功率94.44%，对照组治疗成功率75.00%，两组治疗一年后手术成功率差异显著（plt;0.05）。结论：一次性根管与常规多次根管治疗相比，治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的疗效更为显著，有效缓解疼痛，提升成功???，值得推广。 关键词：一次性根管；多次根管；隐裂性牙髓炎；疗效 [Abstract]Objective：To observe and compare the clinical effects of the two different root canal treatment of cracked pulpitis.Methods：select January 2014 and 2015 January in our hospital for treatment of hidden cleft pulpitis 72 patients as the object of study were randomly divided into the disposable root canal treatment in the observation group（36 cases）and the conventional multiple root canal therapy of the control group（36 cases），observed and compared between the two groups of patients treatment effect.Results：the disposable root canal treatment group in 1 weeks after treatment，the pain rate was 38.89%；multiple root canal treatment in the control group after 1 weeks of treatment，the pain rate was 55.56%.Pain in the observation group were significantly lower than the control group（plt;0.05）.After 1 years of treatment，the observation group treatment success rate of 94.44%，compared the success rate of treatment in the 75% groups，the two groups after one year of treatment success rate was significantly different（plt;0.05）.Conclusion：one-time root canal with conventional multiple root canal therapy compared，treatment of latent crack pulpitis effect is more significant，effectively alleviate pain，improve the success rate，worthy of promotion. [Key words]root canal；multiple root canal；cracked pulpitis；curative effect 本次研究旨在对一次性根管与常规多次根管这两种隐裂性牙髓炎治疗方法的临床效果进行比较，明确一次性根管治疗的疗效优势。选取近年来于我院治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的72例患者作为研究对象，随机分成采用一次性根管治疗的观察组与采用常规多次根管治疗的对照组，观察并对比两组患者的治疗效果，具体报告如下。 1资料和方法 1.1一般资料 选取2014年1月-2015年1月于我院治疗隐裂性牙髓炎的72例患者作为研究