探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用.docVIP

精品论文 参考文献 探讨腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用 桦南县中医医院 154400 摘要：目的：研究并分析腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术应用在腹股沟疝治疗中的临床效果观察。方法：此次研究的对象是选取2014年5月至2015年5月期间我院90例腹股沟疝患者，将其临床资料进行回顾性分析，并随机分为对照组和观察组，每组45例，对照组患者采用无张力疝修补术进行治疗，观察组患者采用腹腔镜疝修补术进行治疗。比较两组患者手术用时、术中出血量、术后下地活动时间、住院时间和并发症发生率。结果：观察组患者手术用时、术中出血量、术后下地活动时间、住院时间均比对照组少，且差异具有统计学意义，Plt;0.05；观察组并发症发生率为4.44%，低于对照组的22.22%，Plt;0.05，具有统计学意义。结论：腹股沟疝患者采取腹腔镜疝修补术进行治疗效果比采用无张力疝修补术好，安全性好，值得推广。 关键词：腹腔镜疝修补术；无张力疝修补术；腹股沟疝；效果 [Abstract] Objective：To study and analyze the clinical effect of laparoscopic hernia repair and tension free hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.Methods：the object of the study is selected 2014 may until May 2015 period in our hospital 90 cases of inguinal hernia patients, the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and randomly assigned to control group and the observation group, 45 cases in each group, control group were treated by tension free hernia repair for treatment observed groups of patients were treated with laparoscopic hernia repair.Compared with the two groups of patients, the amount of blood loss during operation, the time of operation, the time of hospitalization and the incidence of complications.Results：patients in the observed group with surgery, bleeding, postoperative down time, hospitalization time were compared to the control group, and the difference is statistically significant（P lt; 0.05）.Observation group, the complication rate was 4.44%, lower than the control group of 22.22%, P lt; 0.05, with statistical significance.Conclusion：laparoscopic hernia repair for inguinal hernia patients is better than that of the patients with tension free hernia repair, which is safe and worthy of promotion. [Key words] laparoscopic hernia repair；tension free hernia repair；inguinal hernia；effect 腹股沟疝又有直疝和斜疝之分，临床上主要采取手术方式进行治疗腹股沟疝疾病[1]。随着医学技术的进步，微创手术方式已得到广泛的应用。我院对腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术在腹股沟疝治疗中的应用效果进行对比分析，现报道如下。 1 资料和方法 1.1 一般资料 选取2014年5月至2015年5月期间到我院接受治疗的90例腹股沟疝患者作为本次研究对象，所有患者均符合腹股沟疝的相关诊断并排除妊娠、合并凝