高级微观经济学 Part 2_Consumption Theory I.pptVIP

高级微观经济学 Part 2_Consumption Theory I.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
高级微观经济学 Part 2_Consumption Theory I

lecture5 for Chu Kechen Honors College Advanced Microeconomics (Consumption Theory I) Preference and Choice Content: Preference and rationality The rule of choice Budget Demand function WA and demanded law 1.Preference An (acceptable) alternatives set (or a consumption set ) A (weak) preference relation“ ”: a binary relationship on X, for any , means” x is at least as good as y”. A strict preference “ ”: An indifference relation “ ”: Definition: preference on X is rational if: It’s complete: It’s reflexive: It’s transitive: Propersition1: if is rational, then: is irreflexive and transitive is reflexive and transitive and symmetric If 2.The rule of choice We can only observe what a man choice under a certain constrain. Is the man’s preference rational when we observed several choice of him? Or if his preference was rational, what rules will his choice take? Choice construct: a choice under certain budget: Budget set: and , is a budget family, represented a limited list of all possible choice under certain system, nature, technology and other social environments that the decision-maker must take. Choice rule: , maybe contain more than one elements. Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP or WA) : if for certain , and for and , then must Revealed Preference “ ”: Choice set Proposition2: if are rational, then choice construct satisfied WA. Prop.2 indicate that if the decision-maker have rational preference, than his choice satisfied WA. Is his preference rational if his choice is observed satisfy WA? Definition: for , we say “rational preference rationalization Propersition3: if satisfied WA and contain all subsets of X that is ternary and less than t

文档评论(0)

xcs88858 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8130065136000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档