臭氧关节腔注射治疗踝关节骨性关节炎的临床研究.docVIP

臭氧关节腔注射治疗踝关节骨性关节炎的临床研究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
臭氧关节腔注射治疗踝关节骨性关节炎的临床研究

精品论文 参考文献 臭氧关节腔注射治疗踝关节骨性关节炎的临床研究 (重庆三峡中心医院百安分院 重庆 万州 404000) 【摘 要】目的:观察臭氧关节腔注射治疗踝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效,以期为治疗踝关节骨性关节炎寻找更为理想的治疗方法。方法:选取我院2006年4月~2015年4月间收治的210例踝关节骨性关节炎患者作为研究对象,按照随机原则,分为治疗组和对照组,各105例。对照组患者给予中药熏蒸治疗,治疗组患者在对照组患者给药基础上,再给予臭氧关节腔注射治疗,比较两组患者治疗的临床效果。结果:治疗组治疗总有效率为94.28%,对照组治疗总有效率为80.95%,治疗组的临床疗效明显优于对照组患者,差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义;治疗组优良率为81.90%,对照组优良率为59.05%,治疗组的优良率优于对照组患者,差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。两组患者的不良反应发生率无显著差异。结论:采用臭氧关节腔注射治疗踝关节骨性关节炎治疗有效率及优良率更高,使患者快速有效恢复,治疗周期短,是一种有效的治疗方法,值得临床推广应用。 【关键词】臭氧关节腔注射;踝关节骨性关节炎;临床研究 【中图分类号】R 245.95;R684.3 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1004-6194(2015)02-0044-02 【Abstract】Objective:To investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of the ozone intra-articular injections on traumatic osteoarthritis of ankle joint,in order to seek treatment more desirable treatment for traumatic osteoarthritis of ankle joint. Methods:Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The control group patients were treated with traditional Chinese medicine fumigation treatment, while the treatment group patients were treated based on the control group administration, and then were given the ozone intra-articular injections. Compare the clinical therapeutic effect between the two groups. Results:The total effective rate of the treatment group was 94.28%, while the control group was 80.95%, the clinical efficacy of the treatment group was significantly better than the control group of patients, and there was statistical difference of the total effective rate between the two groups ( P<0.05). The successful rate of the treatment group was 81.90%, while the control group was 59.05%, the successful rate of the treatment group was significantly better than the control group of patients, and there was statistical difference of the successful rate between the two groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse effects of the two groups. 【Keywords】ozone intra-articular injections; traumatic osteoarthritis of ankle joint; clinical therapeutic effe

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档