行政不作为的司法审查分析word论文.docxVIP

摘要高效、便利的监督机制对行政不作为进行救济，也使司法机关对行政不作为的监督力度明显不够。 第三部分，首先，阐述了完善行政不作为司法审查制度的重要意义。不但可以最大程度上弥补了行政机关内部监督制约机制的缺陷，还可以有力的遏制 腐败现象的滋生和蔓延，更重要的是社会法治化进程的必然要求。然后对完善 行政不作为案件司法审查提出针对性建议，以及新的行政诉讼法对有关行政不 作为司法审查的新规定：首先，肯定了行政不作为具有合法性和违法性之分， 解决了行政不作为与不履行法定职责相互关系，从概念、本质、司法审查内容 上对行政不作为与否定性行政行为区分。其次，关于完善行政不作为受案范围、 判决适用方面的具体化建议，并提出构建完善的监督机制。关键词：司法审查行政不作为司法审查标准IIAbstractAdministrative not as the damage to the personal interests, public interests of the society, and the interests of the state. Administration according to law as the core content of the rule of law step by step, the administrative organ fails to exercise administrative functions and powers, the delay to perform administrative duties such as It is often seen. situation, this is the law and the draw further apart. Through careful research on the judicial review system, find out the deficiencies and defects, improve and continue to make, has the extremely important theory significance and the practical significance.The main content of this study includes the following parts:The first part, the author analyses the meaning of administrative omission and the current administrative omission cases legal review standard.The second part, the practice as the case study analysis of the status of administrative omission, Predicament and cause in the practice of judicial review: in 1, the status quo. The existing administrative nonfeasance judicial review is to examine the characteristics of narrow range, single standard of review. Specific performance: the scope of review of administrative omission is too narrow, mainly review in accordance with the application of the administrative omission, while ignoring the administrative inaction behavior; the administrative omission and refused to answer multiple administrative reconsideration is not be confused as behavior; in the review as lacking; administrative nonfeasance judicial review process on the distribution the burden of proof is not detailed, specific provisions on the execution of judgment