Cooperative Communication - Electrical Engineering Computer 协作通信-电子工程和计算机.pptVIP

2005 Vodafone Wireless Technology Symposium Cooperative Communication: Diversity, Freedom and Energy David Tse Wireless Foundations U.C. Berkeley MSRI Workshop April 11, 2006 Optimal Relaying High and Low SNR High SNR: diversity and multiplexing tradeoff (Laneman et al, Azarian and El Gamal) Low SNR: diversity and energy transfer. Outline of Talk Quick discussion of high SNR diversity multiplexing results. Focus on low SNR. Derive a simple, non-coherent scheme which achieves the outage capacity of the relay channel. Fading Relay Channel Model High SNR Diversity-Multiplexing Tradeoff Partial Decode-Forward First Phase : S broadcasts first part of message. R joins in whenever it can decode. Second Phase: S transmits second part of message and R continues to relay first part. Destination decodes first part using signal from both relay and source, cancels, then decodes second part coming from source only. DM Tradeoff of Partial DDF Partial DF with full CSI Achieves MISO Low SNR Regime Impact of Fading at Low SNR C? = Outage capacity at outage probability ?. Cutset Bound Decode-Forward Does not meet the cutset bound. Relay cannot “forward” the received energy once it cannot decode the message. Amplify-Forward First Time-slot: Source transmits the vector of encoded data, x. Second time-slot: Relay retransmits the received vector by amplifying. Burstiness Comes to Rescue Bursty Amplify-Forward: - To have less noisy observation at the relay, source transmits rarely (a fraction of the time) but with high power: be large - In order to be power efficient, we should pick a such that the effective rate is small: be small - Can we pick such a ? Yes, because at low outage probability is small. - This scheme achieves the cutset bound in this regime (in contrast to Zahedi El Gamal 03 for AWGN). Summary of results so far Channel Knowledge The result assumes perfect chan