脉冲星到达时间.ppt

* * * * * which maintains two standards optimized for calibration and long-term accuracy. * * * * ● Timing Results A glitch near MJD 50691 (1997, August 30), 94 days after 1997 periastron. A glitch is a sudden jump in pulsar spin rate, with relative amplitude △ν/ν~10-9－10-6 Exponential decay with a assumed time scale of 100 days, we have: * * Pulsar Workshop, 2009, NAOC fitting for and the five Keplerian orbital parameters. Plus the addition of: (b) (c)jumps in at each periastron; (d)jumps in x at each periastron. Residual: 4.3, 4.7, 0.78, 0.46 ms Keplerian Spin-orbital coupling Mass accretion Orbital jump * * Pulsar Workshop, 2009, NAOC Discussion 1. Timing noise: jitter in the pulse arrival times Close to the value of other pulsars with similar frequency derivatives, so the long term timing noise is reasonably well removed n=－36.7 Reflect the high level of timing activity in this young pulsar * * Pulsar Workshop, 2009, NAOC Problems: △ν does not have a constant sign at each periastron Accretion: X-ray obs. show bow shock well outside the pulsar magnetosphere (Hirayama et al. 1999), require high density and/or high outflow velocity Require jumps in frequency derivative Discussion 2. Steps in Rotational Parameters * * Pulsar Workshop, 2009, NAOC Take △x~ 60ms,Kepler’s third law Pb2∝a3 implying large value of △Pb ~ 0.08d, has to be △i=7″ Spin-orbital coupling Pb~3yr, similar to time scale of typical timing noise Timing noise may mask the true period variation Frictional drag from the disk magnitude too small: △Pb =-0.002s, △e=-3X10-13 (Manchester et al. 1995, Wex et al. 1998) The highly inclined disk with respect to the orbit may tilt the orbit with △i=7″ Tidal effects with the main sequence B2e star Depends on the separation of two objects, PSR J0045-7319: 4R*, PSR B1259-63: 24R*