杜邦背板资料不同结构类型.pptVIP

You may wonder why it is that Tedlar? backsheets are so popular in PV modules. Well it goes all the way back to the 1970’s, when NASA starting testing modules and specified Tedlar? backsheets. NASA ran a US$150MM, 11 year program to evaluate ways to increase the efficiency, reliability and cost of PV modules. If this effort was repeated today, it would cost over $700MM. This was a wide ranging and definitive study on module materials. Over 400 module designs were tested, and over 22,000 modules were put in the field to test real world performance. This occurred over 5 research phases. After all this testing evaluation, Tedlar? based backsheets were recommended in ALL the final backsheet designs. That is remarkable. No other protective backsheet material was recommended. Just Tedlar?. This was an extremely influential study. After this study was published, most modules adopted the design recommended by NASA. This helps explain why Tedlar? is the backsheet material preferred by most in the industry. Based on data like this, we believe it is the material best suited for backsheets. You can read the study on line. There is a vast number of publications describing the work that was done. The Executive Summary document provides a good overview of NASA’s work. * Unlike most competitors, we can show you real world examples of very old arrays that have Tedlar? backsheets and are still performing exceptionally well, after about 30 years of outdoor PV use exposure. ? Here we show the first grid connected system in Europe from 1982. This system’s power loss has averaged only 0.4% per year over a 29 year period. That is absolutely remarkable. The Tedlar? backsheet is a critical component in delivering this kind of performance. As Dr. Chianese states, “The quality of material is fundamental, and this should not be compromised.” * SMUD is another example of a high performance, long-lived PV system. This system was installed in 1984 in a very demanding desert environment, and