跨国破产程序模式分析-analysis of transnational bankruptcy procedure pattern.docx

下载文档 降价啦

3
0
约4.92万字
约 39页
2018-05-29 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

跨国破产程序模式分析-analysis of transnational bankruptcy procedure pattern.docx

1、本文档共39页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

跨国破产程序模式分析-analysis of transnational bankruptcy procedure pattern

proceedings. Because of the different perspective and start points, the mode of main-ancillary proceedings in the UNCITRAL model law is different from the mode in the EUIR. The modes in the EUIR and UNCITRAL model law are separately introduced, and then the differences between them are pointed out. The EUIR and UNCITRAL model law are of the same core concept—the center of main interests .This concept determines that which court can open a main insolvency proceeding. But the classifications of proceedings are different in the two modes. The UNCITRAL model law classifies the transnational insolvency proceedings into three kinds: main insolvency proceeding, non-main insolvency proceeding and concurrent insolvency proceeding. Meanwhile, the EURI only classifies the proceedings into two kinds: main proceeding and secondary proceeding. Moreover, the power of the administrator in the main insolvency is also different in each mode.The third part of this article researches on the practice of the main-ancillary mode. Any mechanism shall be examined in practice. The reasonableness of the mode can be proved in practice, and the drawback of the mode can also be found in practice. “Eurofood” is a landmark case in the EU. The main reason for the battle of jurisdiction on “Eurofood” between the Irish and Italy is that they interpret the “center of main interest” differently. To resolve the dispute, the ECJ interpreted the “center of main interest” in its verdict in May 2006. It made the “center of main interest” more clearly for the EU member state. The USA promulgated “Chapter 15” in 2005.The “Chapter 15”totally copied the mode in the UNCITRAL model law, even the order of clauses was still unchanged. On 16th Jan.2008, United State Bankruptcy Court for the SouthernDistrict of New York made a judgment on the recognition of the foreign insolvency proceeding of Basis Yield Alpha Fund. This article believes that the “center of main interest” was applied reasonably in this case. It set