论刑事非法证据排除规则在我国的完善——以两高三部颁布的两个证据规定为背景-on the perfection of exclusionary rules of criminal illegal evidence in china —— based on two evidentiary provisions promulgated by two senior high schools and three departments.docxVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约4.81万字
约 49页
2018-05-28 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

论刑事非法证据排除规则在我国的完善——以两高三部颁布的两个证据规定为背景-on the perfection of exclusionary rules of criminal illegal evidence in china —— based on two evidentiary provisions promulgated by two senior high schools and three departments.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

论刑事非法证据排除规则在我国的完善——以两高三部颁布的两个证据规定为背景-on the perfection of exclusionary rules of criminal illegal evidence in china —— based on two evidentiary provisions promulgated by two senior high schools and three departments

摘要证据是刑事诉讼的核心。证据制度的完善与否关系到一国刑事诉讼制度的文明程度和理性程度。2010 年最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、国家安全部、司法部联合制定了《关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定》和《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》，对完善我国的非法证据排除规则，刑事诉讼制度，提高执法办案水平，推进社会主义法治建设，具有十分重要的意义。两个证据规定的颁布表明我国对非法证据排除规则的重视，我国也在探索建立适合国情的非法证据排除规则。国外一些发达国家已经建立了相对完善的非法证据排除规则，但是每个国家的国情都不相同，我们不能照抄国外的法律，必须以本国的国情为基础，在此基础之上借鉴国外先进经验，找出最适合自己的方式建立非法证据排除规则。本文就非法证据排除规则的概念、价值及国外非法证据排除规则进行探讨，并对我国非法证据排除规则的构建提出相关的建议。关键词：非法证据，非法证据排除规则，完善ABSTRACTEvidences gathering are the essential but vital process of a Criminal Proceeding, and how much extern perfection of a nation’s evidence system is indicates how much that nation’s civilization and rational are, we China has made a great effort in improving our evidence system. In 2010, the combination of Supreme Peoples Court, Supreme Peoples Procuratorate, ministry of public security, ministry of state security and Ministry of Justice enacted two regulations, named “Regulations on Judgmental Evidences Using in Death Penalty Cases” and “Regulations on Expelling Illegal Evidences Using in Criminal Proceedings” respectively. The issuing of these two regulations not only has made a great contribution in improving Chinese legal system building, but also shows that China has paid a strong concern on establishing regulations to expelling illegal evidences gathering in criminal proceeding, and what is more, it also indicates that China is on the way to establish an evidence regulation system that adopt to Chinese condition. In terms of establishing evidence regulation system, some developed countries do have enacted some relative perfect regulations, however, we can not copy their systems mechanically, for each nation has its unique national condition. So to build an evidence regulation system that consistent with China, in addition to referring other nations’ experience, we need to take Chinese condition into consideration, and this is key point of establishing a perfect evidence regulation system. This thesis aims to discus the concepts and values of