rc框架梁刚度放大系数与弯矩调幅取值研究-research on stiffness amplification factor and moment amplitude modulation value of rc frame beams.docxVIP

101111jjjjj:摘要摘要在结构设计中， R.C.框架梁的内力计算以及配筋都是按矩形梁来计算的，并 没有按丁形梁进行计算。而楼板对梁本身的翼缘作用是客观存在的。也就是说， 在设计过程中我们并没有按照 T 形截而梁进行计算，梁的刚度被低估了。故在 结构设计过程中，我们会通过设置梁刚度放大系数来考虑楼板对梁的刚度的贡 献，但这个值的设定并没有一个确切的取值标准。本论文通过有限元软件ANSYS 建立大蠢的框架模型进行线弹性计算和分析，得到了刚度放大系数内板厚马 和梁高 h 比值之间的关系式:亏h，. ?=1 如1.32故当梁商较小时，刚度放大系数可以取值接近于1. 9; 当梁高较大时，刚度放大系数取1.6左右较为合适。R. C. 框架梁端弯矩调幅的合理取值会使得结构的实际内力与变形较接近 于按刚度不变的弹性理论算的结果。同时给实际工程中的施工带来了方便，提 高了施工效率和质量。本论文通过使用 ANSYS 建立钢筋混凝土结构模型进行非 线性分析，得出了当弯矩调阳系数取值 0.85 时，结构设计比较合理。关键词: R.C.梁刚度; ANSYS 非线性有限元;弯矩调幅;AbstractAbstractIn structural design，calculation of R.C. beam and reinforcement are calculated acωrding to the rectangle beam ，and not according to the 下shaped beams. Instead of beam slab of flange is objective existence. 丁h创 is to say，in the des韧 process and we have not according ωthe T-shaped sections of the stiffness calculation，beam beams. So in the structural design process，we will set beam by stiffness amplification coe班icient of beam slab to consider the stiffness of the value contribution ，but no one set and the exact value standard. In this paper，by a finite element so白ware ANSYS frame model of linear elastic computation and analysis，we get the beam equals aboutthe stiffness amplification coefficient between thickness and high ratio of the relationship;?= 1.55+1 .32h /hSo when the depth of beam is smaller，the stiffness amplification coefficient values can be close to 1.9; When the depth of beam is high叽 the stiffnessamplification coefficient values can be close to 1.6.R.C. beam bending of the amplitude values will make structure reasonable and internal force of the actual deformation is close to the constant by stiffness elastictheory calculation results. Meanwhile the practical engineering construction ，improvethe convenient construction quality and efficiency. In this paper，by using ANSYS establishment of reinforced concrete structures，the nonlinear analysis model for amoment attenuation coefficient get th创 structural design is reasonable wh