- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
快速康复与系统化干预对低位直肠癌保肛术患者生活质量影响研究
快速康复与系统化干预对低位直肠癌保肛术患者生活质量影响研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨低位直肠癌保肛术患者实施快速康复及系统化干预后对生活质量的影响。 方法 对2011年1月~2012年12月来我院进行治疗的190例低位直肠癌保肛术患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,190例患者均按照干预的措施分为对照组和研究组各95例,对照组患者的干预方法为实施常规护理,研究组的干预方法为快速康复及系统化干预。生活质量调查采用SF-36,营养风险评分使用NRS 2002。 结果 研究组的体能、体能影响、身体疼痛、一般健康、精力、社会活动、心理健康及精神影响各维度得分与对照组比较均明显较高,拔除胃管时间、拔腹腔引流管时间、拔尿管时间、首次排气时间、首次排便时间、首次下床活动时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组,排便次数少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P
[关键词] 直肠癌;快速康复;系统化干预;生活质量
[中图分类号] R735.3+7 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2013)36-0012-03
Effect research on rapid recovery and systematic intervention for anal rectal cancer surgery patients quality of life
ZHU Liming1 JIA Huimin2
1.Department of Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310000, China; 2.Department of Surgery, China Medical University Shengjing Hospital, Shenyang 110004, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the anal rectal cancer after surgery in patients with rapid recovery and systematic intervention effects on quality of life. Methods A total of 190 cases with low rectal cancer low anal surgery were selected from January 2011 to December 2012 in hospital for treatment, their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, there were divided into two groups in accordance with the intervention measures, control group and research group, 95 cases in each group, control group patients with intervention methods for the implementation of routine nursing, intervention methods for rapid rehabilitation and systematic intervention group. Quality of living was surveyed by SF - 36, nutritional risk score was surveyed with NRS, 2002. Results Teams physical ability and fitness effect, body pain, general health, energy, social activities, mental health and mental influence each dimension score of the research group were significantly higher than the control group, pull out the tube time, abdominal cavity drainage tube pull, pull the urine tube time, exhaust time, for the first time for the first time defecation bed, the first time and hospital stay of the research group were
文档评论(0)