失笑散合四物汤配合康复治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的疗效观察权威资料.doc

失笑散合四物汤配合康复治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的疗效观察权威资料.doc

  1. 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
失笑散合四物汤配合康复治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的疗效观察权威资料

失笑散合四物汤配合康复治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的疗效观察 本文档格式为WORD,感谢你的阅读。   [摘要] 目的 探讨中西医结合治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的疗效。 方法 将126例产妇随机分成实验组63例,对照组63例,实验组应用活血祛瘀类中药口服1个疗程配合盆底康复治疗2个疗程,对照组则应用盆底康复治疗2个疗程,疗程结束后观察两组产妇的盆底肌力恢复情况,1年后随访两组产妇压力性尿失禁的发生率。 结果 实验组产妇的盆底肌力评价Ⅲ级以上58例,对照组41例,压力性尿失禁实验组发生5例,发生率7.9%,对照组14例,发生率22.2%,直肠肛门功能障碍实验组发生3例,发生率4.8%,对照组11例,发生率17.5%,盆腔脏器脱垂实验组发生4例,发生率6.3%,对照组13例,发生率20.6%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 失笑散合四物汤配合盆底康复治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病的疗效优于单纯盆底康复治疗法。   [关键词] 失笑散合四物汤; 盆底康复训练; 盆底功能障碍   [] R271.1 [] B [] 1673-9701(2014)27-0051-03   [Abstract] Objective To explore the therapeutic efficacy of Shixiaosan and Siwu decoction combined with rehabilitation intervention used for pelvic floor dysfunction. Methods The 126 cases were randomly divided into test and control groups. There were 63 patients in every group. The control group accepted only two courses of pelvic floor rehabilitation therapy. However treatment of traditional Chinese medicine combined with two courses of pelvic floor rehabilitation therapy were used in the test group. Then the therapeutic effect of all cases was estimated. The incidence of stress incontinence was investigated after one year. Results The amount of pelvic floor muscle strength up to Ⅲ in the test group was 58 cases, however only 41 cases in the control group. There were 5 cases suffered stress incontinence, and the incidence was 7.9% in the test group. But there were 14 cases suffered stress incontinence, and the incidence was 22.2% in the control group. 3 cases occurred anorectum dysfunction, and the incidence was 4.8% in the test group, however there were 11 cases occurred anorectum dysfunction, and the incidence was 17.5% in the control group. 4 cases suffered pelvic organ prolapse, and the incidence was 6.3% in the test group, while there were 13 cases suffered pelvic organ prolapse, and the incidence was 20.6% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion Our study indicated that the th

文档评论(0)

seunk + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档