Violation Classification Guidance - Calcupa违反calcupa分类指导.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约1.49万字
约 37页
2018-06-24 发布于四川
举报
版权申诉

Violation Classification Guidance - Calcupa违反calcupa分类指导.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Violation Classification Guidance - Calcupa违反calcupa分类指导

Violation ClassificationGuidance For Unified Program Agencies Purpose Purpose: Create a standard violation classification protocol More consistent enforcement response Provide factors for consideration when examining violations Reinforce existing violation classifications and statutory factors Starting point to help evaluators to determine appropriateness of actions This Document Does Not: Set new regulation via “underground regs” Describe an enforcement response for each classification of violation Change existing data reporting or tracking requirements Create a mandate for usage, but instead, sets a common understanding for how violations may best be classified How this fits The “work” in workgroup Work Group consists of Cal/EPA, SWRCB, and DTSC CUPAs Special thanks to our panelists Other participants Layout of the document Intro, Purpose and Reason Existing Nomenclature Clarification/Definition of terms “New” Nomenclature Things to consider in classifying violations Things Not to consider Examples (by class and program) Examples (application of principles) Existing Nomenclature Minor Violation HSC § 25404(a)(3) HW Class I HSC § 25110.8.5 and T22, CCR, § 66260.10 HW Class II T22, CCR, § 66260.10 Minor Violation Violation that does not/is not Result in injury to person or property Pose a significant threat to health/environ Knowing, willful or intentional Chronic or recalcitrant Results in emergency response Allow the violator to benefit economically Hinders the UPA from determining compliance with other rules, regs or rqmts. New Nomenclature Chose to use wording that is similar to existing Hazardous Waste nomenclature Class I Class II Done for ease in tracking (systems already set up to track these – hopefully) Done for ease in reference Class I = “bad” regardless of program Industry doesn’t care what you call it Class I (non-HW) The most egregious type of violation Willful Intentional Negligent Knowing or should have known Pose a significant threat Ch