- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同外科洗手时间和方法对术前消毒效果影响
不同外科洗手时间和方法对术前消毒效果的影响
摘 要 目的:比较不同外科洗手时间和方法对术前消毒效果的影响,探讨术前外科手消毒的最佳方法。方法:按完全随机的方法把手术医生和器械护士共100人平均分为4组:A组和C组分别揉搓洗手1 min 和3 min;B组和D组分别刷洗洗手1 min和3 min,以手细菌培养计数法比较消毒洗手前后手部菌落数、菌落阳性率及不同洗手时?间和方法对皮肤的影响。结果:各组外科消毒洗手前后菌落数及阳性率无明显差异(P0.05);A、C 两组洗手后皮肤外观、完整性、感觉HSA评分较本组洗手前无明显变化(P0.05);B、D 两组洗手后皮肤外观、完整性和感觉HSA评分较本组洗手前明显降低(P0.05);四组洗手后皮肤湿度HSA评分较本组洗手前均明显增加(P0.05)。结论:洗手时间和方法对消毒效果无明显影响,揉搓法对皮肤损伤小,故临床上推荐1 min揉搓外科洗手法。
关键词 外科洗手 消毒效果 医院感染
中图分类号:R472.3; R472.1 文献标识码:B 文章编号:1006-1533(2015)05-0046-03
Effect of the different time and methods for surgical hand antisepsis
on the efficacy of preoperative disinfection
DU Yibao*, HAN Xiaodong, ZHANG Pin, ZHANG Hongwei, ZHOU Yulong, LI Kun, DI Jianzhong**
(Department of General Surgery, The Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Medical School,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China)
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effects of different time and methods for surgical hand antisepsis on the efficacy of preoperative disinfection and to investigate its best method. Methods: Total 100 surgeons and nurses were randomly divided into 4 groups based on the method for their surgical hand antisepsis: scrubbing hands for 1 min and 3 min in group A and C, and scrubbing hands with sponge for 1 min and 3 min in group B and D, respectively. The number and positive rate of colonies on hands were compared by colony counts before and after hand antisepsis and the effects of different time and methods on the skin were also investigated. Results: There were no significant differences in the number and positive rate of colonies before and after hand antisepsis among 4 groups (Pgt;0.05). The appearance, intactness and sensation HAS score of the skin had no significant change after hand antisepsis compared with before antisepsis in group A and C (Pgt;0.05), but significantly decreased in group B and D (Plt;0.05). The HAS score of moisture content was significantly increased after hand antisepsis
您可能关注的文档
- 不同剂量布地奈德混悬液氧气雾化吸入联合蛇胆陈皮口服液对婴幼儿喘息疗效及发作对比研究.doc
- 不同剂量布地奈德雾化吸入与静脉用甲强龙治疗AECOPD对比研究.doc
- 不同剂量布托啡诺在宫腔镜术麻醉中应用效果.doc
- 不同剂量布托啡诺联合表面麻醉在清醒气管插管中应用.doc
- 不同剂量替米沙坦对慢性心力衰竭患者NTproBNP影响分析.doc
- 不同剂量曲马多对导管相关膀胱刺激症影响.doc
- 不同剂量替罗非班在急性心肌梗死患者急诊介入治疗中应用价值.doc
- 不同剂量布地奈德雾化吸入治疗儿童哮喘急性发作临床观察.doc
- 不同剂量来曲唑对116例多囊卵巢综合征患者SHBG与性激素水平影响.doc
- 不同剂量来曲唑用于多囊卵巢综合征患者促排卵有效性及安全性研究.doc
文档评论(0)