- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同手术方法治疗早期乳腺癌疗效及美容效果比较
不同手术方法治疗早期乳腺癌的疗效及美容效果比较
[摘要] 目的 ?Ρ妊芯勘H槭质跤敫牧几?治术治疗早期乳腺癌的手术效果及美容效果。方法 选择2013年1月~2016年1月在我院行手术治疗的早期乳腺癌患者50例,将其中行保乳手术的患者25例设立为保乳组,其余25例行改良根治术的患者设立为改良组,比较两组的切口大小、术中出血量、术后住院时间及并发症情况,并对两组患者的美容效果进行评价。 结果 保乳组患者的切口长度(4.0±1.8)cm,明显短于改良组,保乳组患者的术中出血量(31.0±6.3)mL,明显少于改良组,保乳组患者的术后住院天数(10.5±2.3)d,明显短于改良组,保乳组术后发生皮下积液、皮瓣缺血各2例,其并发症发生率16.0%,明显少于改良组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 保乳组患者的美容效果优良率达68.0%,显著高于改良组44.0%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 保乳手术较改良根治术治疗早期乳腺癌的手术效果好,术中出血少、术后并发症少,且美容效果好,有利于改善患者的生活质量及促进疾病恢复。
[关键词] 早期乳腺癌;保乳手术;改良根治术;美容效果
[中图分类号] R730.56 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)07-0046-03
[Abstract] Objective To comparatively study the curative effect and cosmetic effect of breast conserving surgery and modified radical mastectomy on early breast cancer.Methods 50 patients with early breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2016 were enrolled.Among them,25 patients treated with breast conserving surgery were referred as breast-conserving group. The remaining 25 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy were chosen as the control group. The incision size, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and complications were compared between the two groups, and the cosmetic effect between the two groups was evaluated. Results The incision length of the breast-conserving group was(4.0±1.8)cm, which was significantly shorter than that of the control group. The intraoperative blood loss was (31.0±6.3)mL in the breast-conserving group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group. The number of hospitalization days was (10.5±2.3) days, shorter than that of the control group.In the breast conserving group, there were 2 cases of subcutaneous effusion and 2 cases of flap ischemia,and the complication rate was 16.0%,significantly lower than that of the control group.And there was significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).The excellent and good rate of cosmetic treatment was 68.0% in the breast conserving group, w
您可能关注的文档
- 不同剂量米非司酮在子宫肌瘤保守治疗中疗效分析.doc
- 不同剂量立普妥对老年高血压患者血脂颈动脉粥样硬化疗效观察.doc
- 不同剂量米非司酮治疗子宫肌瘤临床探讨.doc
- 不同剂量米非司酮治疗108例更年期功血临床观察.doc
- 不同剂量盐酸替罗非班联合PCI治疗对老年急性冠脉综合征合并糖尿病患者有效性与安全性研究.doc
- 不同剂量米非司酮治疗绝经期功能性子宫出血临床效果体会.doc
- 不同剂量米非司酮用于中孕流产临床观察.doc
- 不同剂量米非司酮用于子宫肌瘤治疗临床疗效分析.doc
- 不同剂量米非司酮在人工流产术后宫内残留安全性分析.doc
- 不同剂量米索前列醇配伍盐酸丁卡因胶浆用于绝经后取环临床观察.doc
原创力文档


文档评论(0)