不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停影响观察.docVIP

不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停影响观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停影响观察

不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停的影响观察   摘 要:目的 探讨不同心肺复苏程序对院前急救心脏骤停的影响。方法 选取我院2015年2月~2016年12月收治的院前心脏骤停患者94例作为研究对象,按照单双号法分为对照组和观察组,各47例,对照组应用气管插管法复苏,观察组应用气囊面罩通气法复苏,对比两组复苏效果与复苏时间。结果 观察组复苏成功率高于对照组,其通气建立时间、自主心跳时间均明显短于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组死亡率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 气囊面罩通气法复苏效果优于气管插管法复苏,可促使患者心跳快速恢复,值得在临床中优先推广和使用。   关键词:院前急救;不同心肺复苏;心脏骤停   中图分类号:R459.7 文献标识码:A DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.036   文章编号:1006-1959(2018)05-0108-02   Effect of Different Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Procedures on Cardiac Arrest in Pre-hospital Emergency   SHAO Yong-de   (Department of Emergency,Third Peoples Hospital,Dalian116103,Liaoning,China)   Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of different cardiopulmonary resuscitation(CPR)procedures on cardiac arrest in pre-hospital emergency.Methods 94 patients with pre-hospital cardiac arrest were selected from February 2015 to December 2016 in our hospital.According to single and even number method,they were divided into control group and observation group,47 cases in each group,respectively.The control group was resuscitated by tracheal intubation,and the observation group was resuscitated by balloon mask ventilation.The effect and time of resuscitation were compared between the two groups.Results The success rate of resuscitation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,the time of establishing ventilation and the time of spontaneous heartbeat in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,the difference is statistically significant(P lt;0.05).The mortality in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,the difference is statistically significant(Plt; 0.05).Conclusion The effect of balloon mask ventilation is better than that of tracheal intubation,which can promote the rapid recovery of heart rate in patients,and it is worth popularizing and using in clinic.   Key words:Pre-hospital

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

fangsheke66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档