- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
不同护理方式对米非司酮治疗复发性子宫内膜异位症影响分析
不同护理方式对米非司酮治疗复发性子宫内膜异位症的影响分析
【摘要】 目的:探讨不同护理方式对米非司酮治疗复发性子宫内膜异位症患者的影响分析。方法:选取2012年1月-2013年1月本院复发性子宫内膜异位症的患者60例,按治疗及护理方式的不同分为两组,每组30例。观察组进行米非司酮疗法,治疗后予以全程规范化干预护理,对照组进行孕三烯酮疗法,治疗后予以常规护理,两组均治疗6个月,停药3个月,随访6个月,比较两组治疗后的临床效果、两组治疗后的激素水平变化、两组护理依从性及护理满意度情况。结果:观察组、对照组的临床有效率分别为83.3%、43.3%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组治疗后的FH、E2、PRL、LH、孕酮等激素指标均有改善,但观察组治疗后的各项检查指标改善情况显著优于对照组(P0.05);观察组、对照组的满意率分别为83.4%、46.7%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组、对照组的护理依从性分别为94.9%、53.3%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:复发性子宫内膜异位症患者进行米非司酮及全程规范化干预护理,可显著改善患者的症状及激素水平,提高护理满意度及依从性,临床效果确切,值得临床推广。
【关键词】 影响分析; 规范化干预性护理; 复发性子宫内膜异位症; 米非司酮
【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the analysis of the effect of different ways of Mifepristone in the treatment of recurrent endometriosis.Method:60 cases with recurrent endometriosis in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2013 were chosen. According to the different ways of treatment and care, they were divided into two groups, and 30 patients in each group. The observation group was taken with Mifepristone therapy and standardized nursing intervention after treatment, and the control group was taken with Gestrinone therapy with routine care after treatment. The two groups were treated for six months. Following up for 6 months after treatment for three months, the clinical effect, changes in hormone levels, nursing compliance and satisfaction rate of the two groups were compared.Result:The clinical effective rate of the observation group and the control group were 83.3% and 43.3%, and the differences were with statistical significance (P0.05). The FH, E2, PRL, LH, progesterone and other hormones indicators after treatment were improved. The improved situation of inspection indicators in the observation group after treatment were significantly better than the control group (P0.05). The satisfaction rates of the observation group and the control group were 83.4% and 46.7%, and the differences were with statistical significance (P0.05). The compliance care rates in the observation group and control group we
原创力文档


文档评论(0)