- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
动态高血压监测在难治性高血压中指导意义
动态高血压监测在难治性高血压中指导意义
【摘要】 目的:研究并分析动态高血压监测在难治性高血压中的指导意义和应用价值。方法:选取2015年1月-2017年1月笔者所在医院收治的难治性高血压患者112例,将患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组56例患者,试验组采用24 h动态血压监测仪进行监测,对照组采用常规血压监测,对比两组患者日间、夜间、24 h的舒张压、收缩压均值情况。结果:对比两组的日间、夜间、24 h的舒张压、收缩压均值,试验组都低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。难治性高血压患者以非杓型为主,试验组非杓型患者的人数显著多于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);试验组左室肥厚检出率明显高于对照组(P0.05);LVMI与动态血压指标之间存在相关性,但与常规血压监测之间不存在明显的相关性。结论:24 h动态血压用于监测难治性高血压,更能反映出患者的实际血压情况,在临床诊断和治疗难治性高血压中有重要意义,值得临床推广和应用。
【关键词】 动态血压; 难治性高血压; 杓型血压
doi:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2018.2.008 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805(2018)02-0016-03
【Abstract】 Objective:To study the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with refractory hypertension.Method:From January 2015 to January 2017 in our hospital,112 cases with refractory hypertension were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group,56 cases in each group, the experimental group using 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor,the control group using conventional blood pressure monitoring, compared two groups of patients with day and night,24 hours of relaxation the systolic pressure,mean pressure.Result:The mean of diastolic pressure and systolic pressure of day,night and 24 h in the experimental group were lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).Patients with refractory hypertension were mainly non dipper type,and the number of non dipper patients in the experimental group was significantly more than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P0.05) The detection rate of left ventricular hypertrophy in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P0.05).There was a direct correlation between LVMI and ambulatory blood pressure,but there was no significant correlation with routine blood pressure monitoring.Conclusion:24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the treatment of refractory hypertension,can reflect the actual blood pressure of patients,in clinical diagnosis and
文档评论(0)