东京电力.ppt

東京電力?システム企画部?岡部雅夫 東京電力?システム企画部?岡部雅夫 目的外使用?複製禁止 東京電力?システム企画部?岡部雅夫 Comments on 32N1791 WD 19763-5(expert contribution) OKABE, Masao 2008.11.17 2007/07/11 東京電力?システム企画部?岡部雅夫 * Overview There are several general issues we need to have consensus on before going into technical details, based on the objectives of MFI Part5. What is a process from the point of MFI Part5? What is a difference between a process and a service? How deep should MFI Part5 register semantics of a process? 1. What is a process from the point of MFI Part5? Whether a process on physical things is within the scope or not? And Why? Example: Butter-making process input: milk, output: butter Whether a process by human (i.e. non-computerized process) is within the scope or not? And why? Or MFI Part5 intends to have only implementation-free abstract semantics of a process, ignoring by human or computerized? Why a state-transition and event-driven process is out of the scope, although they are important to model a computerized process. e.g. UML sequence diagram, Petri net, Hoar CSP model etc. Note: Table 1, Annex C of WD MFI Part5 says “UML Activity Diagram is the focus of this part”, rather than UML Sequence Diagram. 2007/07/11 東京電力?システム企画部?岡部雅夫 * 2. What is a difference between a process and a service? (1 of 2) At Wuhan Ad-hoc meeting last September, we(?) agreed that MFI Part7 would be “Metamodel for service model registration”. Do we really need both? What is a difference? The Chinese presentation says “A service realizes a process”. But, if we see the RGPS paper, both metamodels look similar. In the service layer of RGPS, “some concepts are referred from OWL-S”, the RGPS paper says. In OWL-S, specification of a service is modeled as a process model, which is represented as a metamodel in the in the service layer of RGPS. Therefore, the metamodel in the service layer of RGPS is a metamodel for process model if we take the OWL-S terms. 2007/07/11 東京電力?システム企画部?岡部雅夫 * 2. What is a