- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
基于GIS和高分辨率遥感数据城市绿地抽样调查方法研究
基于GIS和高分辨率遥感数据城市绿地抽样调查方法研究
(南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏南京210037)
摘要:快速准确地获取城市绿地信息是城市绿地可持续经营和科学规划的基础.以南京市玄武区绿地为研究对象,以2002年SPOT 5遥感数据为主要信息源,以同期南京市主城区交通旅游图、绿地统计资料为辅助信息源,通过目视解译获取各类绿地的准确资料.分别采用简单随机、系统、分层、空间平衡抽样4种计算机屏幕抽样方法,对研究对象的绿地信息进行参数估计,并比较分析各种抽样方法的抽样精度.研究结果表明:目视解译结果与统计数据相比,误差仅为5.1%;4种抽样方法的抽样精度大小排序为:空间平衡抽样(98%)?分层抽样(94%)?系统抽样(82%)?简单随机抽样(75%);空间平衡抽样与遥感图像目视解译的误差仅有2%,可以代替目视解译,较大幅度地降低了目视解译的时间、人工成本.
关键词:城市绿地;抽样调查;地理信息系统(GIS)高分辨率遥感数据
中图分类号:S731.2P208S771.8文献标识码:A文章编号:1671-3168(2011)02-0059-03
Sampling Methods on Urban Green Space Based on
GIS and High Resolution Remote Sensing Data
LIU Min, LI Ming-yang
(College of Forest Resources and Environment, NanjingForestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
Abstract: Timely and accurately obtaining the information of urban green space provides the basis for green space sustainable management and scientific planning. In this article, green space in Xuanwu District of Nanjing City was chosen as the research object, and remote sensing data of SPOT 5 in 2002 was collected as the main information source, while the traffic tourist map of urban Nanjing and green space statistics date in 2002 were employed as the auxiliary information source. Through visual interpretation, accurate data of various kinds of green space in case study area in 2002 was obtained. Then, four sampling methods of simple random sampling, system sampling, stratified sampling and spatial balanced sampling were applied to sampling on green space on computer screen, followed by parameter estimate of green space and accuracy comparison of different sampling methods. Research results showed that: (1) the comparative error of visual interpretation was only 5.1%; (2) as for sampling accuracy, spatial balanced sampling (98%)stratified sampling (94%)system sampling (82%)simple random sampling (75%); (3) compared with visual interoperation, the error of spatial balanced sampling is as small as 2%, showing the possibility of replacing visual interpret
原创力文档


文档评论(0)