- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
基线ALT对阿德福韦酯治疗HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎疗效影响
基线ALT对阿德福韦酯治疗HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎疗效影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨基线ALT对阿德福韦酯(ADV)治疗HBeAg阴性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)疗效的影响。 方法 根据基线ALT,将我院2010年6月~2013年1月门诊收治的55例HBeAg阴性CHB患者分为A、B两组,A组34例,2倍正常上限(2 ULN)≤基线ALT0.05)。各阶段完全病毒学应答率(0.05)。生化应答率:A组为55.9%、76.5%、94.1%、100.0%,B组为57.1%、76.2%、95.2%、94.4%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗过程中,两组均未见HBsAg转阴或血清学转换,未出现耐药。 结论 基线ALT≥2 ULN时,ADV疗效不因基线ALT的升高而进一步提升,基线ALT水平对ADV疗效的影响有限。
[关键词] 慢性乙型肝炎;核苷(酸)类;阿德福韦酯
[中图分类号] R512.6+2 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)03(c)-0035-04
[Abstract] Objective To explore the impact of baseline ALT on adefovir dipivoxil(ADV) in treating HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB). Methods 55 cases of HBeAg negative CHB patients admitted to our hospital from June 2010 to January 2013 were divided into group A and group B according to the baseline ALT.34 cases were in group A,whose baseline ALT were larger than 2 times normal upper limit(2 ULN),but less than 5 ULN.21 cases were in group B,whose baseline were greater than or equal 5 ULN.All patients were used ADV for treatment.The HBV DNA,HBV marker and ALT were rechecked every 3 months.The data that treated for 3,6,12 and 24 months were selected for comparing and analysis. Results The decreased degree of HBV DNA (lg value) in group A after treatment for 3,6,12 and 24 months was respectively 3.3±1.3、3.7±1.1、4.0±1.1、4.1±1.0,which was respectively 3.5±1.5,3.9±1.4,4.1±1.4 and 4.2±1.3 in group B,and the difference was statistical significance when compared at each stage.Complete virological response rate(0.05).Biochemical response rates in group A was respectively 55.9%,76.5%, 94.1% and 100.0%,which was respectively 57.1%,76.2%,95.2% and 94.4% in group B,and the difference had no statistical significance(P0.05).During treatment,any HBsAg overcast or seroconversion were seen between two groups,and drug resistant also not appeared. Conclusion When baseline ALT is greater than or equal 5 ULN,effects of ADV not further increase with the rising of baseline ALT.The level of baseline ALT has limit impact on the effe
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 部编版七年级上册历史课后习题答案.docx VIP
- 数据治理(管理)能力评估 :数据治理与数据管理能力成熟度评估模型2024(62页).pptx VIP
- 智能门禁系统技术创新与应用.pptx VIP
- 开始健身只需五步-来源:英语世界(第2018003期)-商务印书馆有限公司.pdf VIP
- 领悟人生真谛把握人生方向 (修改).pptx VIP
- 博物馆资源融入音乐课程的美育路径研究.docx VIP
- ISO_286-1-公差、偏差和配合的基础-中文-可编辑.docx
- 2020年新版保温工程量计算公式.docx VIP
- 凉拌菜教学课件.ppt VIP
- SW7203数据手册_V13926596180高效率双向升降压.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)