安全型留置针与普通留置针在急救中应用情况比较分析.docVIP

安全型留置针与普通留置针在急救中应用情况比较分析 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨安全型静脉留置针对急诊急救治疗的辅助作用，并与普通留置针临床效果进行对比，总结安全型静脉留置针对护理人员的工作安全提高效果。 方法 整群选取该院2015年5月―2016年5月收治的3 587例急诊患者，将其按照急救留置针方法分为观察组和对照组，观察组1 794例患者，对照组1 793例患者，观察组采用安全型静脉留置针进行，对照组采用常普通留置针，比较两组留置针使用一次穿刺成功率，并对比两组护理人员刺伤发生率。 结果 观察组一次成功率99.94%，对照组一次成功率为81.20%，观察组护士刺伤率0.17%，对照组护士刺伤率2.12%，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。 结论 急诊治疗当中需要对患者建立静脉通道，以便及时补充体液，并在需要紧急手术治疗时提高手术准备速度，挽救患者的生命，安全型静脉留置针进行静脉穿刺效果更高，护理人员以及周围人群受伤率明显降低，与普通留置针相比安全性更高，能够保护护理人员不受感染，减少针刺伤及职业暴露。值得临床推广应用。 　　[关键词] 急救护理；安全型静脉留置针；普通留置针；不良反应发生率 　　[中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742（2016）12（c）-0118-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of emergency treatment for indwelling auxiliary safe vein indwelling needle and the clinical effect were compared， summed up the safety venous indwelling for work safety and improve the effect of nursing staff. Methods Group selection 3 587 cases of emergency patients in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016， according to the emergency indwelling needle were divided into the observation group and control group， 1 794 patients in the observation group， 1 793 patients in the control group， the observation group with safety venous indwelling needle， control group with regular catheter， indwelling between the two groups the use of needle puncturing success rate， and compare the two groups of nursing staff injury incidence. Results The success rate of the observation group was 99.94%， the control group was a success rate of 81.20%， the observation group of nurses stabbed rate of 0.17%， the control group of nurses stabbed rate of 2.12%， the difference was statistically significant （P 0.05）. Conclusion Emergency treatment need to establish intravenous access for patients， in order to replenish the fluids， and in need of urgent surgery to improve surgical preparation speed， save the lives of patients， safety venous indwelling needle puncture effect was higher， the nursing staff and the people around the injury rate decreased obviously， higher safety compared with ordin