中国最低工资与最低生活保障的就业与福利效应分析——基于武汉的案例-analysis of the employment and welfare effects of minimum wage and minimum living security in china —— based on the case of wuhan.docxVIP

中国最低工资与最低生活保障的就业与福利效应分析——基于武汉的案例-analysis of the employment and welfare effects of minimum wage and minimum living security in china —— based on the case of wuhan.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中国最低工资与最低生活保障的就业与福利效应分析——基于武汉的案例-analysis of the employment and welfare effects of minimum wage and minimum living security in china —— based on the case of wuhan

华 华 中 科 技 大 学 硕 士 学 位 论 文 II II Abstract The early postwar period, Western Europe and the Nordic countries first established the modern social security system. In 1894 New Zealand was first implemented a minimum wage system. Since the birth of two systems, welfare effects and employment effects are the focus of debate among scholars but no consensus. First of all, the paper studies the origins and development of minimum wage and the minimum living security system in China. Found that the standard of the two policies are low, weakening the low-income people’s welfare and employment. Secondly, a case in Wuhan based on field research data, the paper studies that the minimum wage there lags behind the growth in average wages and the growth of GDP per capita, and the ratio of the lowest living security line and the disposable income of urban residents is lower than that of the international standard. Draw conclusions from the analysis: On the one hand, despite the low level of subsistence prevents the social maintenance lazy from happening, it weakened the subsistence of the core - the basic welfare and security functions. On the other hand, the low level of minimum wage maintains the survival needs, but it is difficult to bear and raise the quality of labor and other family members to support the development of the type of demand, resulting in weakening of the functions that minimum wage system should function to protect the interests of workers. And the gap of the two lines is too small if workers need to pay social insurance, which will be an awkward phenomenon that employment income is less than the minimal income. Positive stimulus to employment was offset by low welfare policy, so the employment of a positive incentive effect is not obvious.Furthermore, because between these two systems and policies lack of care of each other and butt that will be easy to form the conflict between the policy and game low efficiency. In addition, in order to develop a standa

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档