- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血对患者神经功能炎性因子水平影响
微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗脑出血对患者神经功能炎性因子水平影响
【摘要】 目的 探讨脑出血治疗中应用微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术对其神经功能、炎性因子水平的临床影响。方法 84例脑出血患者, 按随机分配原则分为参考组与实验组, 各42例。参考组患者采取内科保守治疗, 实验组患者在参考组基础上给予微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术治疗。对两组患者治疗前后的神经功能缺损评分以及治疗后炎性因子水平进行比较观察。结果 治疗前, 两组患者的神经功能缺损评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后, 实验组患者的神经功能缺损评分(19.52±3.78)分明显低于参考组的(28.42±4.26)分, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后, 实验组患者的血清超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白介素-6(IL-6)分别为(23.63±10.62)、(35.87±11.36)、(18.75±8.24)ng/L, 明?@优于参考组的(40.52±11.45)、(46.78±8.71)、(34.74±8.72)ng/L, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术对脑出血患者神经功能、炎性因子水平的改善效果理想, 值得推广。
【关键词】 微创下置管抽吸液化引流手术;脑出血;神经功能;炎性因子水平;影响效果
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.09.007
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive suction tube aspiration and drainage on the level of nerve function and inflammatory factors level in patients with cerebral hemorrhage. Methods A total of 84 patients with cerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 42 cases in each group. The control group received medical conservative treatment, and the experimental group received minimally invasive suction tube aspiration and drainage on the basis of the control group. The nerve function defect score before and after treatment and inflammatory factors level after treatment were compared and observed in two groups. Results Before treatment, both groups had no statistically significant difference in nerve function defect score (P0.05). After treatment, the experimental group had obviously lower nerve function defect score as (19.52±3.78) points than (28.42±4.26) points in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). After treatment, the experimental group had serum hypersensitive C reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor - α (TNF-α), and interleukin - 6 (IL-6) respectively as (23.63±10.62), (35.87±11.36) and (18.75±8.24) ng/L, which were obviously better than (40.52±11.45), (46.78±8.71) and (34.74±8.72) ng/L in the control group, an
文档评论(0)