心理护理干预应用于手术室非全身麻醉患者效果分析.docVIP

心理护理干预应用于手术室非全身麻醉患者效果分析 　　[摘要] 目的 探究心理护理干预应用于手术室非全身麻醉患者的效果。 方法 随机选自2012年10月～2013年10月在我院手术室行非全身麻醉的患者96例按照随机数字表方法分成两组，每组48例，予以常规护理作对照组，予以心理护理干预作研究组，分析两组患者手术前后相关指标变化、术后VAS和SAS评分以及护理的满意度情况。结果 经过不同护理干预后，研究组患者的心率和血压均比对照组低，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；且研究组VAS评分为（3.1±1.8）分，比对照组（5.6±2.1）分低，且研究组SAS评分（50.9±3.8）分，比对照组（62.8±3.2）分低，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；同时研究组护理的满意度95.83%，比对照组（79.17%）高，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 针对手术室非全身麻醉患者，予以心理护理干预能够有效改善患者心率和血压恢复，且患者术后疼痛和焦虑程度较小，具有一定临床应用和研究价值。 　　[关键词] 心理护理；手术室；非全身麻醉 　　[中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701（2014）22-0092-04 　　[Abstract] Objective To explore the efficacy of psychological nursing intervention to patients with none general anesthesia on the operating room. Methods A total of 96 cases of patients with none general anesthesia were randomly selected since October 2012 to October 2013 in our hospital operating room， they were divided into two groups according to random number table method， 48 cases of each group， routine nursing care patients were carried on in control group， the experiment group were given psychological nursing intervention， index of correlation before and after surgery， postoperative VAS and SAS scores， and the satisfaction of nursing were analyzed of two groups. Results After different nursing intervention， the experiment groups heart rate and blood pressure were lower than the control group， with statistical significance （P0.05）； And VAS score of the experiment group （3.1±1.8） was lower than the control group （5.6±2.1）， and the experiment group SAS score （50.9±3.8） was lower than the control group （62.8±3.2）， with statistical significance （P0.05）； At the same time， experiment group′s nursing satisfaction（95.83%） was higher than the control group（79.17%）with statistical significance（P0.05）. Conclusion Psychological nursing intervention can effectively improve the patients heart rate and blood pr essure recovery， with lower postoperative pain， anxiety levels and patients to the operating room in general none anesthesia patients， this is grea