- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
心理护理结合同伴教育对艾滋病患者抗病毒治疗服药依从性影响
心理护理结合同伴教育对艾滋病患者抗病毒治疗服药依从性影响
【摘要】 目的 ?论心理护理结合同伴教育对艾滋病患者抗病毒治疗服药依从性的影响。
方法 650例艾滋病患者, 根据护理的方法的不同分为实验组与对照组, 每组325例。两组患者均实行抗病毒治疗, 对照组患者采用常规护理, 实验组患者在常规护理的基础上采用心理护理结合同伴教育, 比较两组患者服药依从情况、机会性感染发生情况及相关临床指标。结果 治疗护理后, 实验组患者服药依从率为98.77%, 明显高于对照组的81.23%, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗护理后, 实验组患者的CD4+T淋巴细胞计数明显高于对照组, 护理3个月内的漏服次数、未按规时间的服药次数均明显少于对照组, 差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗期间, 实验组发生机会性感染5例, 发生率为1.54%, 对照组发生机会性感染42例, 发生率为12.92%;实验组机会性感染发生率明显低于对照组, 差异具有统计学意义(χ2=31.398, P0.05)。结论 对艾滋病患者实行抗病毒治疗的同时使用心理护理结合同伴教育, 可以有效的提高患者的服药依从性, 值得推广。
【关键词】 心理护理;同伴教育;抗病毒治疗;艾滋病;服药依从性
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.35.080
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the effect of psychological nursing combined with peer education on medication compliance of antiretroviral therapy in acquired immune deficiency syndrome patients. Methods A total of 650 patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome were divided by different nursing methods into experimental group and control group, with 325 cases in each group. Both groups received antiviral therapy. The control group received conventional nursing, and the experimental group received psychological nursing combined with peer education on the basis of conventional nursing. Comparison were made on medication compliance, occurrence of opportunistic infections and related clinical indicators between two groups. Results After nursing, the experimental group had obviously higher medication compliance as 98.77% than 81.23% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). After treatment and nursing, the experimental group had obviously higher CD4+T lymphocyte count than the control group, and obviously less number of missed visits and the number of irregular medication within 3 months of nursing than the control group. Their difference was statistically significant(P0.05). During treatment, the experimental group had 5 cases with opportunistic infections, accounting for 1.54%, while the control group had 42 cases with opportunistic infections
文档评论(0)