护理思维模式干预对实习护生临床决策能力效果评价.docVIP

护理思维模式干预对实习护生临床决策能力效果评价.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理思维模式干预对实习护生临床决策能力效果评价

护理思维模式干预对实习护生临床决策能力效果评价   [摘要] 目的 探讨通过不同护理思维模式的干预法对实习护生临床决策能力的影响。 方法 选择2012年7月~2014年7月在我院实习的护理学生152名,分层抽样抽出测量得分在70~80分段的116名,将其随机分为模拟情景训练组、PBL组与对照组。模拟情景训练组在教学中加强临床情景模拟训练;PBL组将PBL教学法运用到实习中;对照组采用传统临床带教法。分别对三组护生于培训前和培训后6个月、9个月进行临床决策能力评分的对比。结果 模拟情景训练组、PBL教学法组临床决策能力评分在培训6个月和培训9个月后与实习前比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。模拟情景训练组、PBL教学法组的临床决策能力评分在培训6、9个月优于同期对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 护理思维模式的干预在护理临床教学中的应用能够有效提高护生的临床决策能力。   [关键词] 思维模式;护理干预;决策能力;效果评价   [中图分类号] G421 [文献标识码] C [文章编号] 1673-9701(2016)06-0101-02   Effect evaluation of nursing thinking pattern intervention on clinical decision-making capacity of nursing students   YANG Shumei LI Zhiru ZHANG Min   Nursing Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College, Qiqihar 161041, China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the impact of different modes of nursing thinking pattern intervention on clinical decision-making capacity of nursing students. Methods 152 nursing students who practiced in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2014, were chosen and stratified sampling was conducted to choose 116 people scoring from 70 points to 80 points. They were randomly divided into the scene-simulated training group, PBL group and the control group. The scene-simulated training group received strengthened clinical scene-simulated training during teaching, and PBL group applied PBL into the internship, and the control group received traditional clinical teaching. Then, the decision-making capacity of the three groups of nursing students before training and six months after the training, nine months after the training was measured and compared. Results The differences in comparing the decision-making capacity scores before training and after 6 months or 9 months in scene-simulated training group and PBL group were statistically significant(P0.05). The clinical decision-making ability scores in scene-simulated training group and PBL teaching group after training 6,9 months were better than those in the control group of the same pe

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档