牙科陶瓷表面不同处理对其粗糙度影响.docVIP

牙科陶瓷表面不同处理对其粗糙度影响.doc

  1. 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
牙科陶瓷表面不同处理对其粗糙度影响

牙科陶瓷表面不同处理对其粗糙度影响   [摘要] 目的 比较釉瓷上釉、表面抛光、自身上釉、抛光后釉瓷上釉4种不同的方法研磨后的牙科陶瓷表面粗糙度的影响。 方法 制作28个牙科陶瓷试件,随机分成4组,分别采用釉瓷上釉法、表面抛光法、抛光后釉瓷上釉法、自身上釉法对表面进行处理,每组各7个试件。测量4组试件的表面粗糙度值,并对测量出的各组试件的表面粗糙度值进行统计学分析。 结果 釉瓷上釉组所测粗糙度值为(0.247±0.009)μm,表面抛光组所测粗糙度值为(0.301±0.008)μm,自身上釉组所测粗糙度值为(0.303±0.007)μm,抛光后釉瓷上釉组所测粗糙度值为(0.302±0.007)μm。自身上釉组、表面抛光组、抛光后釉瓷上釉组与釉瓷上釉组的表面粗糙度值比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);表面抛光组与自身上釉组、抛光后釉瓷上釉组表面粗糙度值比较,差异无统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 牙科陶瓷表面研磨后采用抛光后釉瓷上釉法和表面抛光法后对陶瓷表面性状无影响,牙科陶瓷表面研磨后采用釉瓷上釉法和自身上釉法对表面性状影响较大。   [关键词] 牙科陶瓷;抛光;表面粗糙度;釉瓷上釉;自身上釉   [中图分类号] R783 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2015)07(b)-0156-04   [Abstract] Objective To study and compare the effect of four different kinds treatments on roughness of dental ceramics: porcelain glazing, surface polishing, glazing and porcelain glazing after polishing. Methods Twenty-eight dental ceramic samples were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups, which were treated by surface polishing, porcelain glazing, porcelain glazing after polishing and glazing separately respectively, with 7 samples in each group. Roughness values of the samples were measured and analyzed. Results The roughness values of porcelain glazing group was (0.247±0.009) μm, the roughness values of surface polishing group was (0.301±0.008) μm, the roughness values of glazing group was (0.303±0.007) μm and the roughness values of porcelain glazing after polishing group was (0.302±0.007) μm. The roughness values of porcelain glazing group was compared with those of the other groups, the differences were statistically significant (P 0.05), the roughness values of polishing group was compared with those of glazing group and porcelain glazing after polishing group, the differences were not statistically significant (P 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference between porcelain glazing after polishing and surface polishing on dental ceramics surface after grinding; there is significant difference between porcelain glazing and glazing on dental ceramics surface after grindin

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档