- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
神经刺激器定位下腰丛坐骨神经联合阻滞在老年患者股骨头置换中应用
神经刺激器定位下腰丛坐骨神经联合阻滞在老年患者股骨头置换中应用
【摘要】 目的 探讨神经刺激器定位下的腰丛?坐骨神经联合阻滞麻醉在老年患者股骨头置换手术中麻醉效果。方法 选择择期行单侧股骨头置换手术的老年患者56例,年龄65岁,ASAⅠ~Ⅲ级,随机分为两组,神经阻滞组(N组)和硬膜外阻滞组(E组),每组28例,在麻醉前(T1),麻醉后(T2),手术开始时(T3),手术结束时(T4),记录MAP、HR、SpO2、麻醉效果以及不良反应。结果 56例患者均阻滞完善,麻醉效果满意,两组患者的MAP在麻醉前(T1)和手术结束时(T4)差异无统计学意义(P0?05),硬外阻滞组患者的MAP在麻醉后(T2)和手术开始时(T3)显著低于神经阻滞组(P0?05)。结论 神经刺激器定位技术下腰丛?坐骨神经联合阻滞应用于老年患者股骨头置换手术是安全有效的,对血流动力学影响小,不良反应少。
【关键词】 腰丛?坐骨神经阻滞;神经刺激仪;老年患者Application of lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block in femur head surgery of aged patients by nerve stinulator LEI Peng?fei, GAO Shan, WANG Pei?shan? Department of Anesthesiology, Xingxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang 453000,China
【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the anesthesia efficacy of lumbar plexus combined with sciatic nerve block by peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) for the aged undergoing unilateral femur head surgery? Methods fifty?six aged patients undergoing unilateral femur head surgery, in ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ grade, were randomly divided into two groups with 28 cases in each group?Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block by PNS were used in group N, while epidural anesthesia was used in group E? MAP, HR and SpO2of the two groups were monitored in preanesthesia(T1), postanesthetic(T2), stare of operation(T3) and end of operation(T4)? And the anesthesia efficacy and adverse reaction were recorded?Results All patients in two groups had satisfactory anesthesia?The MAP were not significantly difference between group N and group E in T1 and T4?In T2 and T3, the MAP of group E was lower than group N significantly?The HR and SpO2of two groups were not significantly difference in all time?Conclusion Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block by PNS is safe and effective for the aged undergoing unilateral femur head surgery for its less effects on hemodynamics, fewer adverse reaction, long time of analgesia and early recovery.
【Key words】 Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block; Peripheral nerve stimulator; Aged patient-------------------------------------------
文档评论(0)