- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
系统护理心理干预对无抽搐电休克治疗患者焦虑抑郁情绪影响
系统护理心理干预对无抽搐电休克治疗患者焦虑抑郁情绪影响
[摘要] 目的 探?护理心理干预对MECT患者情绪的影响。 方法 将2016年3~7月在我院住院的94例行MECT患者随机分成实验组与对照组,每组47例;对照组予普通常规护理,实验组在常规护理的基础上增加系统护理心理干预2个月;干预前后采用自编的护理满意度调查表、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)调查家属对护理满意度及两组患者的焦虑抑郁情绪进行评定,并分析结果。 结果 干预前两组患者的SAS、SDS评分及家属对护理满意度差异无统计学意义(P0.05);干预后实验组患者的SAS、SDS评分低于对照组、家属对护理满意度高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 系统护理心理干预有助于缓解行MECT治疗患者的负性情绪,提高护理质量。
[关键词] 护理心理;MECT;焦虑;抑郁
[中图分类号] R473.74 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)10-118-04
Impact exploration of systematic nursing psychological intervention to the anxiety and depression in patients with non convulsive electric shock therapy
CEN Hongzhou
Department of Nursing,Maoming Third People’s Hospital,Maoming 525200,China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the impact of nursing psychological intervention to the anxiety and depression in patients with non convulsive electric shock therapy (MECT). Methods 94 patients with MECT in our hospital from March 2016 to July 2016 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 47 cases in each.Patients in control group were treated with general routine nursing,and patients in experimental group were treated with psychological nursing intervention was added for 2 months on the basis of routine nursing.Before and after the intervention,the nursing satisfaction questionnaire,the self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the self rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to investigate the family members’ satisfaction with nursing and the anxiety and depression of the two groups, and to analyze the results. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients before and after SAS,SDS score and family members’ satisfaction with nursing (P0.05).After intervention,the scores of SAS and SDS in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group,and the nursing satisfaction of the family members was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P [Key words] Nursing psychology;
文档评论(0)