超声检测子宫下段瘢痕缺陷对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择临床价值.docVIP

超声检测子宫下段瘢痕缺陷对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择临床价值.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
超声检测子宫下段瘢痕缺陷对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择临床价值

超声检测子宫下段瘢痕缺陷对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择临床价值   【摘要】 目的 探讨超声检测子宫下段瘢痕缺陷对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式选择的临床价值。方法 118例早孕证实有子宫瘢痕缺陷的妊娠晚期孕妇设为观察组, 并选择同期118例检查无子宫瘢痕缺陷的妊娠晚期瘢痕子宫孕妇设为对照组, 对两组孕妇均进行超声检查, 比较其子宫前壁下段厚度、分娩方式, 记录观察组不同瘢痕级别孕妇妊娠结局。结果 观察组孕妇子宫前壁下段厚度明显低于对照组, 且不同瘢痕级别间子宫前壁下段厚度比较, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组孕妇剖宫产率为52.54%(62/118), 显然高于对照组的32.20%(38/118), 差异具有统计学意义(χ2=9.9953, P0.05)。新生儿窒息程度遂孕妇瘢痕级别升高而加重, 且瘢痕级别越高其发生率越高;不同瘢痕级别间发生率比较, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 临床中对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠采用超声检查, 可为临床预测子宫破裂风险及选择正确分娩方式起到指导性作用, 值得推广。   【关键词】 瘢痕子宫;超声诊断;再次妊娠;临床价值   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.06.002   【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the clinical value of ultrasonic detection of lower uterine scar defect on mode of delivery of scar uterine re-pregnancy. Methods There were 118 pregnant women confirmed with uterine scar defect in late pregnancy as observation group, and concurrent 118 pregnant women confirmed without uterine scar defect in late pregnancy as control group. Two groups of pregnant women were examined by ultrasound to compare the thickness of the lower anterior wall thickness of the uterus and mode of delivery. The pregnancy outcome of pregnant women with different scar levels in the observation group was recorded.   Results The observation group had obviously lower lower anterior wall thickness of the uterus than the control group, and there was statistically significant difference in lower anterior wall thickness of the uterus in different scar levels (P0.05). The observation group had obviously higher cesarean section rate as 52.54% (62/118) than 32.20% (38/118) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.9953, P0.05). Severe asphyxia and mild asphyxia in newborns are positively related to the level of parturients, and the higher the scar level, the higher the incidence. There was statistically significant difference in incidence of different scar levels (P0.05).   Conclusion In clinic, ultrasonic detection for re-pregnant women with scar uterine plays a guiding role in predicting the ri

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档