宫颈癌患者术后临床护理路径的效果分析.docVIP

宫颈癌患者术后临床护理路径的效果分析 　　[摘要] 目的 观察宫颈癌患者术后予以临床护理路径的效果及其影响。 方法 研究对象选取我院2015年8月～2016年7月间接受宫颈癌根治术治疗的宫颈癌患者88例，依照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组，每组44例。对照组患者予以常规护理，观察组患者依据制定的临床护理路径进行护理。比较两组患者对健康教育知识的知晓程度、护理满意度、两组患者并发症发生率及自理能力恢复情况。 结果 观察组患者健康知识知晓度明显高于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（χ2=3.94，P=0.04）；观察组患者满意度高于对照组，且差异均具有统计学意义（χ2=4.06，P=0.04）；术后自理能力恢复率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（χ2=6.06，P=0.01）；观察组患者并发症发生率明显低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（χ2=5.09，P=0.02）。 结论 临床护理路径在宫颈癌术后护理效果明显，提高了患者满意率，有助于患者术后自理能力恢复，降低了术后并发症发生率，值得在临床推广。 　　[关键词] 临床护理路径；宫颈癌；宫颈癌根治术；术后并发症 　　[中图分类号] R473.73 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701（2017）12-0157-04 　　[Abstract] Objective To observe the effect and influence of post-operation clinical nursing pathway in patients with cervical cancer. Methods 88 patients with cervical cancer receiving radical surgery in our hospital from August 2015 to July 2016 were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table， with 44 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given routine nursing， while those in the observation group were given established nursing guided by clinical nursing pathway. The awareness of healthy knowledge， nursing satisfaction， incidence rate of complications， and self-care ability were compared between two groups. Results The awareness of healthy knowledge was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant（χ2=3.94， P=0.04）. The nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant（χ2=4.06， P=0.04）. The self-care ability after operation was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant（χ2=6.06， P=0.01）. The incidence rate of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant（χ2=5.09， P=0.02）. Conclusion Post-operation clinical nursing p