- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
人工硬脑膜和自体筋膜在重型颅脑损伤术中应用对比研究
人工硬脑膜和自体筋膜在重型颅脑损伤术中应用对比研究
【摘要】 目的:探讨人工硬脑膜在重型颅脑损伤大骨瓣减压术中应用效果。方法:分析2010年1月-2014年6月本院收治的100例颅脑损伤大骨瓣减压术行硬脑膜修补患者的临床资料,其中采用人工硬脑膜修补的患者共50例作为观察组,采用自体膜修补的患者共50例作为对照组。所有患者均于术后3~6个月返院行颅骨修补术。观察并对比两组术后皮下积液、脑膨出、颅内感染及癫痫等并发症发生情况及二期颅骨修补术的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院费用。结果:两组的术后颅内感染、脑膨出发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),观察组术后皮下积液和癫痫发生率明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组住院费用显著高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:人工硬脑膜安全可靠,能减少术后并发症的发生,并能为二期颅骨修补创造条件,是硬脑膜修补的理想材料,对于经济条件允许的患者首选使用。
【关键词】 颅脑损伤; 大骨瓣减压; 硬脑膜修补材料
【Abstract】 Objective:To explore the clinical effect of the biological type artificial dura mater applicated in the big bone flap decompression of craniocerebral injury. Method:The clinical data of 100 patients with craniocerebral injury who received the big bone flap decompression dura repaired were given retrospectively analysis from January 2010 to June 2014, 50 patients were adopted the biological type artificial dura repair as observation group, 50 patients were adopted autologous membrane repair as control group. All patients underwent skull repair 3 to 6 months after the decompression surgery. The postoperative complications such as subcutaneous effusion, encephalocele ,intracranial infection and epilepsy,the operation time, intraoperative blood loss , postoperative flow of the secondary phase skull repair surgery and hospitalization expenses were observed and compared. Result:Compared the incidence of postoperative intracranial infection and encephalocele of the two groups, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). The cost of hospitalization in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P 【Key words】 Craniocerebral injury; Decompression with the large bone flap; Dural repair materials
First-author’s address:Feicheng Mining Central Hospital of Shandong,Feicheng 271608,China
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2015.25.022
大骨瓣减压手术可以有效地降低颅脑损伤患者的颅内压,在去除骨瓣之后,人为的敞开硬脑膜释放脑组织的压力[1]。以往手术常直接旷置敞开的硬脑膜不予缝合,此方法虽然减压充分但却带来了脑脊液瘘、皮下
原创力文档


文档评论(0)