- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
99例慢性心力衰竭患者心脏彩超影像表现的研究
99例慢性心力衰竭患者心脏彩超影像表现的研究
[摘要] 目的 探讨彩色多普勒超声诊断仪在诊断多病因的慢性心力衰竭病症时的临床作用与意义。 方法 整群选取该院2013年3月―2014年8月收治的99例诊断为多病因慢性心力衰竭患者,用心脏彩超设备进行检查,记录左室射血的分数(LVEF)和左心室舒张末期的内径(LVDd)以及左心房的内径(LVD),并依据EF值随机分为正常组和降低组,对比分析该两组患者治疗前后的LVEF值变化情况。结果 正常组全部患者在治疗前所测左心室射血分数为(62.24±13.26)%,降低组的左心室射血分数为(33.51±12.79)%,两组患者在治疗前差异有统计学意义(P0.05);降低组全部患者在经过治疗以后所测量左心室射血分数是(55.21±7.48)% ,与治疗前相比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 用彩色多普勒超声诊断仪所检查左室射血的分数对于多病因的心力衰竭病症诊断不具备特异性,不能单一的作为确诊病症标准,但是可以作为一项此病临床治疗过程中重要可信的监测指标。
[关键词] 心脏彩超;多病因;慢性心力衰竭
[中图分类号] R541.6 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)08(c)-0168-02
A Study about the Echocardiography of 99 Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
LIU Shu-hua
Department of function inspection, the People’s Hospital of Huadian City, Huadian, Jilin Province, 132400 China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical effect and significance of ultrasound diagnostic equipment in the diagnosis of chronic heart failure with multiple etiology. Methods Selected 99 patients diagnosed as chronic heart failure with multiple etiology in our hospital from 2013 March to 2014 August. Inspected them with heart ultrasound equipment, and record left ventricular ejection fraction records (LVEF) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVDd) and diameter of left atrium (LVD). According to the EF value, these patients were randomly divided into the normal group and the lower group. Compared the changes of LVEF value of the patients in two groups before and after treatment. Results The LVEF of patients in normal group were (62.24 ± 13.26)% before treatment, while that of lower group was (33.51 ± 12.79)%, and there were differences between the two groups before treatment (P0.05), with statistical significance. The LVEF of patients in lower group after treatment was (55.21 ± 7.48)%, compared with that before treatment, the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion Using color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic equipment to inspect LVEF has no specificity for the diagnosis of heart fai
原创力文档


文档评论(0)