- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
干休所高龄人群骨质疏松防治的探讨
干休所高龄人群骨质疏松防治的探讨
[摘要] 目的 探?健康教育干预对干休所高龄人群骨质疏松患者的防治效果。方法 选取某军队干休所2014年1月~2016年1月于卫生所就诊的136例高龄男性骨质疏松症患者为研究对象,按所在社区分为2组。对照组64例,仅发放骨质疏松防治手册、饮食防治骨质疏松宣传资料、骨质疏松的认识等宣传资料自行学习;观察组72例,进行有关骨质疏松的健康教育干预。随访12个月,观察比较两组患者的骨质疏松认知水平得分及骨密度数据变化。结果 两组患者健康教育干预前知识问卷得分平均分差异无统计学意义(t=0.121,P0.05)。健康教育后,观察组患者知识问卷得分平均分较对照组有较大改善,差异有统计学意义(t=13.342,P0.05)。健康教育后,观察组患者各实验室检查结果较对照组均有较大改善,差异有统计学意义(t=17.980,16.990,14.879,14.442,13.776,P均0.05)。结论 健康教育干预对干休所高龄骨质疏松症患者具有良好的效果和积极的意义。
[关键词] 健康教育;骨质疏松;防治;骨密度
[中图分类号] R681 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2016)20-221-03
The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in elderly population of retired cadres
YING Xuehong
Health-center, SLIM NAVY Retired Cadres, Beijing 100161, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the prevention effect of health education intervention toosteoporosis in the elderly population of retired cadres. Methods 136 cases of senile male patients with osteoporosis cured in the health-center from January 2014 to January 2016were selected as the study objects.According to the community, they were divided into 2 groups. 64 cases were divided into control group, andthey were only handed out issuance of osteoporosis prevention manual, diet prevention and treatment of osteoporosis publicity materials, osteoporosis awareness and other promotional materials to learn. 72 cases were divided into observation group,and they were treated with related osteoporosis health education intervention. During the follow-up period of 12 months, the scores of osteoporosis and bone mineral density data in the two groups were observed and compared. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups before the intervention of health education (t=0.121, P0.05). After health education, compared with the control group, the average score of the observation group was significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant(t=13.342, P0.05). After health education, compared with the control group, patients in the observation grou
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 网络与信息安全管理员(网络安全管理员)三级认证理论考试复习题库(含答案).docx VIP
- 高超声速飞行器技术发展现状与前景展望.pptx VIP
- 中国临床肿瘤学会(csco)乳腺癌诊疗指南2025.docx VIP
- 腹部手术围手术期疼痛管理指南(2025版)ppt课件.pptx VIP
- JGJT 220-2010 抹灰砂浆技术规程.pdf VIP
- 2025职业卫生技术人员评价方向考试题库(含答案).docx VIP
- 2024年大学生就业力调研报告-智联招聘-202405.docx VIP
- 煤堆放环保措施.docx VIP
- 革兰氏阴性菌感染碳青霉烯类抗菌药物的治疗选择培训课件.pptx VIP
- 2025职业卫生技术人员评价方向考试题库含答案.docx VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)