- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
强制性使用运动治疗结合头皮针抽提法提高脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能临床的研究
强制性使用运动治疗结合头皮针抽提法提高脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能临床的研究
[摘要] 目的 ?^察强制性使用运动治疗结合头皮针抽提法对脑卒中偏瘫患者的临床疗效。 方法 以本院收治的126例脑卒中偏瘫患者为研究对象,对照组采用常规康复治疗法进行治疗,观察组患者则采用强制性使用运动治疗结合头皮针抽提法进行治疗。对两组患者治疗的临床疗效进行比较比较,采用Wolf运动功能量表(WMFT)、简易上肢功能评定量表(STEF)对两组患者的上肢功能的改善情况进行比较。采用Barthel指数对两组患者的治疗前后及随访过程中日常活动能力进行比较,并对两组患者神经功能缺损情况进行评分对比。 结果 (1)观察组患者治疗后的临床总有效率高于对照组患者。(2)观察组患者治疗后的WMFT、STEF评分高于对照组患者,观察组患者上肢功能优于对照组患者。(3)观察组Barthel指数、神经功能缺损得分优于对照组患者,观察组患者日常活动能力优于对照组。 结论 采用强制性使用运动治疗结合头皮针抽提法对脑卒中偏瘫患者进行康复治疗有着显著的治疗效果,可明显改善患者的上肢功能状况,对患者的远期日常生活活动能力也有一定的提高作用。
[关键词] 脑卒中;强制性使用运动治疗;头皮针抽提法;上肢功能
[中图分类号] R246.6 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2017)17-0062-04
[Abstract] Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of compulsory application of exercise therapy combined with scalp acupuncture drawing method in the stroke patients with hemiplegia. Methods A total of 126 stroke patients with hemiplegia who were admitted to our hospital were selected as the research subjects. The control group was given conventional rehabilitation therapy, and the observation group were given compulsory application of exercise therapy combined with scalp acupuncture drawing method. The clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients were observed and compared. The improvement of upper limb function was compared between the two groups by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and the Simple Upper Limb Function Rating Scale (STEF). Barthel index was used to compare the daily activity ability of the two groups before and after treatment and during the follow-up visit, and the scores of neurological impairment were compared between the two groups. Results (1)The total clinical effective rate of the patients in the observation group after the treatment was higher than that in the control group.(2)WMFT and STEF scores in the observation group after the treatment were higher than those in the control group, and the upper limb function in the observation group was better than that in the control group. (3)The Barthel index and neurologic impairment scores in the ob
原创力文档


文档评论(0)