民事救济的环保功能有限性再论环境侵权与环境侵害的关系-北大法宝.DOCVIP

【法宝引证码】 CLI.A.1215903? 原文链接： HYPERLINK /qikan/62701bd08811e7da67655a5fc34de67bbdfb.html \t _blank /qikan/62701bd08811e7da67655a5fc34de67bbdfb.html 民事救济的环保功能有限性 再论环境侵权与环境侵害的关系 期刊名称： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyclass?ClassCodeKey=20, \t _blank 《法律科学》 期刊年份： HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?FilterItems.JournalYear=2016 \t _blank 2016 摘要： 民事救济论者希望用民事法律保护环境，但对民事救济和环境损害两者的对接试验说明，民事救济可以对“他人”的人身财产权益提供有效救济，但无法对非“他人”的利益提供救济。环境利益是人类的利益，环境损害是对人类环境利益的损害。创造“环境权”的努力无法为人类环境利益创造具有自然人、法人身份的利益主体。民事救济手段中的救治已然损害的赔偿性责任方式、阻遏性责任方式、预防性责任方式都不能对环境损害提供救济。我们无法为环境损害找到符合民事救济制度中的责任人条件的行为人。造成环境损害的“总行为”的主体是不应按民法原理对行为负责，也没有能力对环境损害负责的“众人”。能够对环境损害负责的适格主体是政府，这已经在环境法制建设和环境保护实践中得到验证。 英文摘要： Proposers of civil remedies theories hope to protect environment by civil law. However, experiment on civil remedies and environmental damage shows that civil remedies can only supply efficient remedies to personal rights and property rights, but not for environmental interests. Environmental interests are human interests, environmental damage infringes human environmental interests. Efforts in creation of environmental rights cannot form interest parties in human environmental interests having identity as natural person and cooperation. Compensational remedies for existed harm, injunctive remedies and preventive remedies cannot supply remedies for environmental damage. We cannot find tortfeasors for environmental harm as in terms of requirements in civil remedy system. Parties of “Sum behavior” causing environmental harm are the mass who shall not be liable to behavior according to civil theories and also not be able to be liable to environmental harm. The right party for environmental harm is government, which has been proved in environmental law construction and environment protection practice. 作者： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyauthor?author=徐祥民 \t _blank 徐祥民 HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyauthor?author=辛帅 \t _blank 辛帅 分类： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyclass?ClassCodeKey=,0802 \t _blank 民事诉讼法 中文关键词： HYPERLINK