公物利用救济论-宪法学与行政法学专业论文.docx

II II 沿革这两个角度展开，揭示公物利用的复合型主观公权利性质，有权利必 有救济。 第二章介绍公物利用救济的对象。通常认为救济是“第二性权利”，作 为救济对象的权利（即原权利、第一性权利）寓于一定法律关系之中。在 公物利用法律关系中，欲了解被侵害进而需要救济的是何人的何种性质的 权利，需要对公物利用法律关系的权利（力）结构展开分析，不同性质的 权利遵循不同的救济途径，而权力则不需要救济。 第三章介绍公物利用救济的现状。公物利用的侵权形态呈现多样化， 可能因公物运营所处阶段而异，可能因侵权行为方式而异，可能因受侵害 的主观公权利种类而异；分析公众用公物在设立、维护、废止阶段所可能 存在的公物利用侵权形态以及公务用公物常见的公物利用侵权形态；对当 前救济途径、救济方式的瓶颈展开论述。 第四章介绍公物利用救济的完善。在救济途径的完善上，分别从行政 诉讼内救济与行政诉讼外救济两个方面提出完善公物利用救济机制的建 议；在救济方式的完善上，强调应兼顾现有救济方式的改良与阙如救济方 式的增设。 关键词：公物利用 主观公权利 侵权形态 救济途径 救济方式 III III DISCUSSION ON THE REMEDY ABOUT THE UTILIZATION OF THE PUBLIC PROPERTY ABSTRACT In the modern society,constructing service-oriented government has become the mainstream of every country’s political reform and development trend.Fundamentally,the concept about service-oriented government requires administrative organs to change their functions and to increase supplies for the society,so as to better meet the needs of social public.As “the means of material”of administrative activities,the public property carries administrative organs’ important mission to supply life-care for the public.Protecting the publics rights to utilize public property and building a perfect public property infringement remedy mechanism are the keys to implementing above important mission.Throughout theories and legislations of major developed countries,researches of property system have achieved certain results.And on the issue of remedies about the utilization of the public property, the major developed countries have formed remedy approaches,such as residents’lawsuit and the state compensation for the public property’s damage,and remedy means,such as general pay judgment and preventive stop judgment.In contrast,researches of the public property system in our country are just getting started,and on the issue of remedies about the utilization of the public property,there are disputes in theory and blanks in practice.Firstly,academics PAGE PAGE VI lack correct understandings of the basic theory, such as the defini