公众干预问题的法理反思-法律专业论文.docx

I I 公众干预问题的法理反思 摘 要 摘 要 在群体社会中，每个人由于利益和需求的不同，因而容易产生利益冲突。当 纠纷产生时，国家作为处理纠纷的执法主体，总是出现得不及时。公众为了尽快 解决纠纷，往往忽略法律程序，不合理甚至违法地替代国家执法实施干预。这些 行为不仅侵犯了别人的合法权利，更是严重地破坏了社会的法律秩序，影响了我 国的法治进程。公众干预作为一种私人执法，应当作为国家执法的一种良性补充， 共同去推动社会的法治进程。因此本文通过案例分析的方法，深入分析现今公众 干预的不正当性，试图为公众干预走上合法化、组织化的正规道路提出一些相应 的建议，以期其以最有效的方式发挥它的补充作用。本文首先论述公众干预与法 律原理的相悖，主要论述动物权利保护者的行为并不符合紧急避险的要求，并且 是一种由个人偏好而引起私人执法，损害了动物买卖者的自主权利；然后论述公 众干预替代国家执法的僭妄，破坏了法律的利益衡平，造成了社会秩序的混乱； 再次，通过对一个具体案例的分析，从破坏正义和自由的角度证成公众干预的不 正当性；最后对规制公众干预的法律机制提出一些建议，强调公众干预特别是动 物保护者的权利与义务以及如何通过法律来加以规范。 关键词：利益冲突 私人执法 公众干预 作 者：侯雅风 指导教师：胡玉鸿 II II 英文摘要 公众干预问题的法理反思 The Legal Philosophy Thinking on Public Intervention Abstract In the groups society,because of the different interests and needs of each person, its easy to cause conflicts of interest. When dispute occurs, the country as a main body of dispute processing in law always didnt show up timely. The public in order to resolve the dispute as quickly as possible, usually ignore the legal procedures of law, unreasonably or even illegally to replace the national law enforcement to intervene society dispute,behaviors like that not only violated the legal rights of others, but also severely damage the legal order of the society, influenced the process of the improvement of the law. Public intervention, as a kind of private law enforcement, should be considered as a benign supplement of the national law enforcement,together to promote social process of the improvement of law. This article use the method of case analysis , profoundly analysis the unjustification of current public intervention cases,trying to puts forward some corresponding suggestions for the legalization and organization of public intervention,so it can play its complementary role in the most efficient way.Firstly,this article pointed out that the public intervention conflicts with the legal principles,mainly discuss the behaviors of animal lovers does not accord with the requirement of emergency actions, and the personal preferences caused priva