人文学者与电子原典的互动组员-台北医学大学图书馆.PPTVIP

ALTHOUGH SOME SCHOLARS THOUGHT THAT DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS WERE NOT CONDUCIVE TO BROWSING AND SERENDIPITOUS DISCOVERY ,OTHERS FOUND THAT THEY ALLOWED NEW FORMS OF SERENDIPITY TO EMERGE.雖然一些學者認為，數字化的環境不利於有助於瀏覽資訊奇遇和偶然發現，另一些發現，他們允許新形式的偶然出現。 SERENDIPITOUS DISCOVERY ALSO HAPPENS BY OPENING SEVERAL WINDOWS ON THE COMPUTER DESKTOP .?THERE ARE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SERENDIPITOUS DISCOVERY THAT HAPPENS IN BROWSING BOOKS OR OTHER MEDIA AND SERENDIPITY OCCURRING WHEN SOMEONE WORKS WITH SEVERAL COMPUTER WINDOWS.   在電腦中開啟許多的視窗會有意外的發現收穫。當有些人使用電腦視窗工作時，偶然會發現在瀏覽書籍或其他媒體的時候會有相似之處。 Library books are organized by subject. so shelves collocate books that may be relevant to someone working on that subject . 圖書館館藏是由主題來分門別類的。所以將書本擺放在書架上的人可能就是與此書及有關聯的相關人士。 WINDOWS CONTAIN THE CONTENT RELATED TO THE SCHOLAR’S RESEARCH INTERESTS ,AND THEY COLLOCATE MATERIALS AROUND THE RESEARCHER’S SENSE OF WHAT IS RELEVANT. 視窗包含的內容可能就是學者的研究興趣，所以他們的研究就和環繞的館藏資料有很大的關係。 ALTHOUGH IT IS POSSIBLE TO WORK IN THIS MANNER ONLINE, ALL PARTICIPANTS WHO REFERRED TO THE INTERROGATION OF TEXTUAL DATABASES WORK OFFLINE. IN-DEPTH EXPLORATION OF A SMALL NUMBER OF TEXTS ALLOWS RESEARCHERS TO INVESTIGATE CONNECTIONS. 雖然有可以在用線上這方面來工作，但所以參與的人都還是有可能會有資料庫上的問題。允許研究人員深入的對於小部分的文獻做研究。  INTERROGATION OF E-TEXTS MADE IT EASIER TO UNDERSTAND RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BODIES OF KNOWLEDGE. 可以更加容易的理解電字原文中的疑問及關係，並且得到相關的知識。 對圖書館角色的看法 THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY WAS SEEN AS A MAJOR FACTOR IN PROMOTING E-TEXT. ALTHOUGH NO ONE CRITICIZED LIBRARIANS, SOME PARTICIPANTS EMPHASIZED HOW IMPORTANT THE SERVICE WERE THAT THEY RECEIVED FORM THEIR SUBJECT LIBRARIANS, WHILE OTHERS DISCUSSED DIFFICULTIES THEY HAD IN LEARNING HOW TO WORK WITH E-TEXT IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY TRAINING OR WORKSHOP ORGANIZED THROUGH THEIR INSTITUTION. 大學圖書館被看作是一個促進電子原文主要因素。儘管沒有人批評館員，但是那些學者還是強調，學習學科館員的形式是極為重要的服務，而困難的部分是，討論了在學習如何與點子原文中的文字，但是卻沒有任何培訓或舉辦的機構。 ? IN THE COMPLEX PROCESS OF EVALUATING THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OF E-TEXT, RESEARCHERS VALUED ACCESS TO E-TE