高考英语写作评分量表研究-学科教学(英语)专业论文.docxVIP

高考英语写作评分量表研究-学科教学(英语)专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
高考英语写作评分量表研究-学科教学(英语)专业论文

questions:1)What are the dimensions of the rating scale on NMEWT?2) What is the weight of each dimension on the rating scale?3)To what degree is the rating scale valid? To answer the above questions,the research is designed as following procedures:First of all,in order to decide the dimensions of the rating scale,the research methods of literature review,interview and questionnaire are employed.Based on Bachman’S CLA,the descriptors of the rating scale are collected by means of literature review from those well—known domestic and foreign rating scales like IELTS,TOEFL, CET-4,TEM一4 etc.,and the interviews of English teachers in senior high school s and raters in NMET.After the collection of descriptors,the researcher designs a questionnaire to explore the importance that those descriptors play in the rating scale on NMEWT from the views of English teachers,raters and students,SO as to find out the valid components of the rating scale.Exploratory factor analysis of collected data is used subsequently to investigate the main dimensions of the rating scale. Secondly,on the purpose of investigating each dimension’S weight,the researcher invites two experienced raters to score thirty writing samples on the task of NMEWT(20 1 5)in Hunan Province.The step—by—step method in regression analysis is used to get the regression coefficients of different dimensions in this initial rating scale,SO as to make an ultimate decision on the weight of each dimension on the rating scale.Thirdly,in 万方数据 order to verify the validation of this new rating scale,the researcher asks four raters to score thirty writing samples on the task of NMEWT (national version)in 20 1 5 based on the new analytic rating scale and the old holistic one.The evidence collects from two aspects:the comparative study on scoring validity between two rating scales and the analysis of the analytic rating scale based on MFRM on their inter-rater consistency, intra-rater consistency,the interaction between r

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档