电化学腐蚀法与502胶显现发射过弹壳表面手印的比较V6.DOCVIP

【法宝引证码】 CLI.A.1240164? 原文链接： HYPERLINK /qikan/7408a5703a5f735bd984896a4645d24ebdfb.html \t _blank /qikan/7408a5703a5f735bd984896a4645d24ebdfb.html 电化学腐蚀法与“502”胶显现发射过弹壳表面手印的比较研究  期刊名称： HYPERLINK /journal/articlebyclass?ClassCodeKey=110, \t _blank 《中国司法鉴定》 期刊年份： HYPERLINK /journal/findarticle?FilterItems.JournalYear=2018 \t _blank 2018 摘要： 目的比较电化学腐蚀法和“502”胶熏显法显现发射过弹壳表面的手印效果，研究电化学腐蚀显现手印的过程对枪弹痕迹检验的影响。方法选取同一批次生产，未经发射的64式7.62毫米手枪弹40枚，在其表面捺印油汗混合手印，于手印捺印1天、10天、30天后进行发射，收集发射后的弹壳，对弹壳进行电解显现潜手印的处理，再次对其表面的同一枪弹痕迹进行拍照。将显现前后的枪弹痕迹进行对比，观察电化学腐蚀法显现潜手印时对传统检验弹壳表面的枪弹痕迹的影响。结果“502”胶熏显法显现发射过弹壳表面的潜手印时无任何效果；电化学腐蚀法可以显现出发射过弹壳表面的手印，纹线较为清晰连贯，手印遗留时间距发射时间较长(8~15天)的手印，发射后潜手印的显现率较高；射击过程中形成的枪弹痕迹，形态未发生明显变化，但是会破坏火药烟晕痕迹。结论电化学腐蚀法能够用于显现发射过弹壳表面的潜手印，显出效果较好，手印遗留时间距发射时间较长(8~15天)的手印，发射后潜手印的显现率较高；电化学腐蚀法应放在枪弹痕迹检验之后进行。 英文摘要： Objective To compare the developing effects by the electrochemical corrosion method and the 502 adhesive fuming method on the surface of fired shell, and the influence of electrochemical corrosion method on the examination of bullet trace. Method 40 unfired bullets (7.62mm)of 64 pistol of the same batch were selected. Mixed ink and sweat fingerprints were made on the surface of the 40 bullets. The bullets were fired after 1 day, 10 days and 30 days, respectively. The electrochemical corrosion method and the “502” adhesive fuming method were used to develop the fingerprints. The bullet trace was examined before and after developing fingerprints to evaluate the influence. Results The “502” adhesive fuming method couldn’t develop the latent fingerprints on the fired shells. In contrast, the electrochemical corrosion method showed good results, as the ridges of the developed fingerprints was relatively clear and coherent. The fingerprints left 8-15 days before firing had more chance to be revealed by this method. The electrochemical corrosion method didn’t affect the bullet trace formed during firing, but it destroyed the gunpowder smoke trace. Conclusion The electrochemical corrosion meth