- 1、本文档共26页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Abstract
Theft in most cases “computation stolen goods how many determines guilt ” ,Theft
amount is convicted of the elements, is also the basis of sentencing, thus the theft amount of
accurate determination has important role. Amount committed attempted theft in the amount
determined and sentencing in a judicial practice has been a problem .In this paper, A County
of Guangxi province of Yi’s group theft case as the starting point, through the discussion of
the existing focus and differences,points out the various viewpoints exist some shortcomings,
and then has made superficial views of the case‘s conviction and sentencing,and in the end of
the article puts forward the property price appraisal involved the advice of credibility.
The thesis is divided into four parts. The first part is a brief introduction of details of a
case. In this case defendant Yi takes advantage of the warehouse administrator is not in
Company ,called on the four workers to stripping the cable wire in victims warehouse for
take make money , after was arrested by the company boss. Trial for both parties have a big
disagreement about this case electric cable line value,then the court in accordance with the
re-appraisal price conclusion determines guilt the punishment to the defendant.
The second part is the case of focus. In this case the existence of damage to the cable
value, the theft target amount and how sentencing three controversial points.
The third part of the detailed analysis of the three cases focus. As for the destruction of
the cable value, There is a disruption of the cable value is 5760 yuan and the destruction of
the cable value is 2240 yuan two views;As for the theft target amount, there are Yi five
people damaged cable value and to the warehouse where all the similar short cable values
prevail and Yi five people a day can damage the cable value based argument;Because the
perpetrator attempted theft,as for the case’s Sentencing has a huge amount of theft and theft
accomplishe
文档评论(0)