胸腔闭式引流并注入尿激酶治疗胸腔积液的效果观察.docVIP

胸腔闭式引流并注入尿激酶治疗胸腔积液的效果观察.doc

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
胸腔闭式引流并注入尿激酶治疗胸腔积液的效果观察.doc

胸腔闭式引流并注入尿激酶治疗胸腔积液的效果观察 [摘要]目的 探讨胸腔闭式引流并注入尿激酶治疗胸腔积液的效 果。方法选择2013年1月?2014年3月来木院就诊的110例结核性胸 腔积液患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方法的不同,将所有患者按随机抽样 的方法分为实验组和对照组,对照组胸腔闭式引流后不作其余处理,实验 组在安装胸腔闭式引流管后,在胸腔内通过引流管注射尿激酶。1个疗程 后通过超声或CT确定胸腔积液程度,化验胸腔积液引流液屮的成分,进 行疗效评价。结果治疗前,两组患者胸腔积液中的蛋白质、白细胞浓度 差异无统计学意义(P0?05),实验组治疗后胸腔积液中的蛋白质、白细 胞浓度较对照组均明显下降(P0.05)o实验组的总有效率为98. 2%;对照 组为74. 5%,两组的总有效率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 胸腔闭 式引流并注入尿激酶治疗胸腔积液的效果明显好于传统单纯胸腔闭式引 流,效果显著,值得临床推广。 [关键词]胸腔闭式引流;尿激酶;胸腔积液 [中图分类号]R561.3 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1674-4721 (2015) 05 (c) -0085-03 [Abstract] Objective To explore the effect of thoracic close drainage combined with urokinase injection treating pleural effusion. Methods From January 2013 to March 2014, 110 patients with tuberculous pleural effusion treated in our hospital were selected all patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to random sampling method. In control group, no further treatment was applied after thoracic closed drainage, while in experimental group, after installation of thoracic drainage tube, urokiriase was injected through drainage tube. The level of pleural effusion was determined by ultrasound or CT after 1 course of treatmenl, and components of drainage fluid in pleural effusion was tested aiming at effect evaluation. ResuIts Before treatment, there was no statistical difference of protein and white blood cell concentration in pleural fluid of patients in two groups (P0. 05) ? After treatment, protein and white blood cell concentration in pleural fluid in experimental group was greatly decreased compared with that in control group respectively ( P0. 05 ) . The total effective rate in experimental group was 98. 2%, while in control group, the total effective rate was 74.5%,which displayed a statistical differenee (P0.05)? Conclusion Effect of thoracic close drainage combined with urokinase injection treating pleural effusion is significantly better than traditional thoracic close drainage alone .It obtains a remarkable effect, and is worthy of

文档评论(0)

ggkkppp + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档