几种空气源热泵除霜方式性能比较.PDFVIP

  • 7
  • 0
  • 约1.18万字
  • 约 3页
  • 2019-01-26 发布于湖北
  • 举报
33 2 Vol.33,No.2 第 卷 第 期 几种空气源热泵除霜方式的性能比较 202 4 April. 2012 年 月 0253-4339 2012 02-0047-03 文章编号: ( ) - doi:10.3969/j.issn. 0253 4339. 2012. 02. 047 几种空气源热泵除霜方式的性能比较 张 杰 兰 菁 杜瑞环 高国奉 (河北省暖通空调工程技术研究中心 河北工程大学城建学院 邯郸 056038) 摘 要 针对空气源热泵除霜问题,分别对逆循环除霜系统、热气旁通除霜系统和相变蓄能除霜系统进行对比实验,并对三 种除霜方式的除霜时间、除霜时压缩机排气压力、室内温度波动等特性进行比较分析。实验结果表明,相变蓄能系统除霜 时的压缩机排气温度比另外两种系统高,使得冷凝温度升高,更有利于缩短除霜时间,且室内温度相对稳定,系统能耗也 随之减少。 关键词 热工学;除霜性能;比较;逆循环除霜;热气旁通除霜;相变蓄能除霜;空气源热泵 + 中图分类号:TQ051.5; TB61 1 文献标识码:A The Performance Comparison of Several Defrosting Modes for Air-source Heat Pump Zhang Jie Lan Jing Du Ruihuan Gao Guofeng School of Urban Construction, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056038, China ( ) Abstract The defrosting time, discharge pressure, indoor temperature fluctuations and other defrosting characteristics of air source heat pump were experimentally investigated at three defrosting modes, i.e., reverse cycle defrosting, hot gas bypass defrosting and phase change material defrosting. The results showed that the performance of phase change material defrosting system is better than the others. The phase change material has increased the discharge temperature and the condensing temperature, which benefits to the decrease of defrost time and energy consumption, and the indoor temperature is relatively stable. Keywords Pyrology; Defrosting performance; Comparison; Reverse cycle defrosting; Hot-gas bypass defrosting; Phase change material defrosting; Air source heat pump

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档