鉴定结论的审查与认定-诉讼法学专业论文.docxVIP

摘 摘 要 鉴定结论是一种重要的证据表现形式，但鉴定结论并不具有高 于其它证据形式的证明力和证据能力。鉴定结论的基本概念和特 征、证据属性与诉讼功能，以及各种鉴定结论之问不可避免的矛盾 与冲突，均决定了法官对其进行审查与判断的必要性。虽然我图 直坚持实事求是的证据制度，但事实上，目前我国法官对鉴定结论 的审查与认定，离不开证明力和证据能力判断活动的本质规律，无 疑仍是一个自由心证的过程。法官在审查与认定鉴定结论这一法律 评价活动中，应当严格依照程序规则，在有关制度的约束下，依据 经验法则和逻辑法则，运用法官的自由心证去规范地加以审查与认 定。目前我国对鉴定体制管理上的混乱性，相关诉讼程序制度的欠 缺与不完善性，经验法则本身内在的缺陷性，以及法官整体职业素 质的优良化程度，等等各方面存在的一系列问题，使得法官对鉴定 结论的审查与认定活动难以达到科学化、规范化，不能充分发挥鉴 定结论的证据效能。 因此，如何结合我国的实际情况，规范对鉴定体制的管理；通 过对诉讼程序和其它证据规则的确立与完善，来合理制约法官审查 与认定鉴定结论的自由心证；提高法官职业素质以确保其认证能 力，便纳入了本文的论证范围。其目的在于以良好的程序避免自[1j 心证的副作用，从而达到准确认定事实、公正处理案件的司法公正 目标。 关键词：鉴定结论审查认定规范化 AbstractAn Abstract An expert conclusion iS important kind of form of evidence but expert conclusions haven’t the force of evidence and admissibility above other forms of evidence．The basic conception and features of expert conclusions，the attributes and functions in action and the inevitable contradictions and conflicts of all kinds of expert conclusions decide the necessity of examination and verification by judge，Although country hold firm the system of evidence of“seek truth from facts”，in fact，at present，examination and verification of expert conclusions by judge in country can’t separate from the basic laws of acts of iudgment about the force of proof and admissibility of evidence，which iS undoubtedly of free belief in heart．In the acts of evaluation of laws of examination and verification of expert conclusions，a judge should comply with procedural rules restrictly，restricted by relative systems， in light of practical and logical rules，examine and verify them legally with free belief in heart．At present，a series problems existing in every aspect，such chaos of the management of the system of identification，lack of relative procedural systems in action，the defects of the practical rules such and the extent of the professional quality ofjudges in general，make the acts of examination and verification can’t measure up to scientification and consistence with norms and can’t develop the effect