酒后驾驶肇事刑事责任研究-法学专业论文.docxVIP

1111 1111 1 1 II I I I ll 111 11 1 11I ＼1 92441 2 摘要 酒后驾驶行为人主观状态的复杂发展、客观上交通肇事的复杂多变，导致了 我国司法对于醉酒驾驶引发的交通肇事的处理出现了诸多混乱。通过对原因自由 行为理论的阐述与应用，厘清酒后驾驶交通肇事行为人的主观罪过；通过对以危 险方法危害公共安全罪与交通肇事罪以及其他犯罪的关系论证，解决酒驾肇事的 罪名以及刑罚的认定。 原因自由行为理论对酒后驾驶肇事案件的处理的最大贡献在于分开了“醉 酒与“驾驶”两个阶段的行为，通过考量两个阶段不同的主观罪过，以及在两 个阶段转换中的罪过的变化，能够综合得出行为人对危险行为、危害后果的主观 罪过，从而决定和影响行为人的刑事责任。 交通肇事罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪并不是非此即彼的关系，通过考察 行为人的主观罪过以及驾车的环境、位置、车况等客观原因，进而判断其行为是 否足以构成以危险方法危害公共安全罪中的“其他危险方法”，在具有逃逸、逃 逸致人死亡情节时，刑法对二次行为应予以充分的评判。 关键词：原因自由行为，酒后驾驶，刑事责任，交通肇事，认定 AbstractAbstract Abstract Abstract Witll the complex and subjective development of the drink-driving doers，the complexity of the traffic accidents and the lack of legislation of drink—driving behaviors，the conflict between‘how to judge’’and“what to judge’has came Lqto a truth．By combining the elaboration and application of the action libera in cause； through the relative demonstration of crime of endangering public security，traffic accident crime and other crimes thus to resolve the issues on judging the drink-driving crimes． ne greatest devotion of the action libera in cause is that it has diversified the behavior of‘‘drunken’’and‘‘driving’，by inspecting the subjective crimes in the two periods and the transformation of both the crimes and periods，the decision of the crimes from the doers could be made at the same time． The relationship between the traffic accident crimes and the crime of endangering public security is not a contradiction，by inspecting the subjective behaviors of the doer，the objective reasons such as the environment，position and condition of driving，and then assess whether it’S enough to constitute the clause of “other kinds of dangerous manners”in the law of public security．And the sufficient judgment should be made on the behavior of escaping and escape after traffic offense sending people to death． Key words：Action libera in cause，Drink—driving，Criminal responsibility， Committing traffic offences，Determination II 骂 目录目 目录 目 录 摘要 ．．I Abstract．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．