关于“食物相克”的文献回顾与人群认知调查-卫生毒理学专业论文.docxVIP

兰州大学硕士学位论文得分比较差异无统计学意义；赞成食物相克说法的有279人，认为应避免的有 兰州大学硕士学位论文 得分比较差异无统计学意义；赞成食物相克说法的有279人，认为应避免的有 241人，经常或偶尔考虑的有273人，听说过误食“相克食物造成死亡的有82 人，分别占84．55％、73．03％、82．73％和24．85％；常见的“相克食物不良反 应率差异无统计学意义；仅32人食后产生过不适，占9．70％；此外，亲朋、书 籍是大学生获取食物相克相关信息的首要途径． 结论：近年来食物相克受到广泛关注；调查对象对食物相克认知存在差异， 部分常见“相克’’食物具备一定食用安全性；有必要树立科学的饮食观，营养知 识的宣教工作有待进一步加强。 关键词：文献计量分析兰州地区饮食行为营养教育认知调查 II 兰州大学硕士学位论文Review 兰州大学硕士学位论文 Review of literatures and survey of public recognition over mutual restriction between foods Abstract Objective： To explore the present situation of research and the trend of development by metrological analysis of literature，in order to lay the essential rationale for the determination correct research direction．T0 study the recognition situations of mutual restraint between foods among some groups of people in Lanzhou area，and supply scientific evidences for correctly treating mutual restraint between foods．To study the cognition of mutual restraint between foods and practice of diet arrangement among undergraduates and explore the safety of some mutual restraint foods． Methods： Literatures on mutual restraint among foods were sought from Chinese Journal Full．text database dated from 1994 to 2008．With the documentation of thCSC literatures’characteristics such as year,author,periodical distribution，literature nature， the literatures were carefully analyzed．Meanwhile，books containing knowledge of mutual restraint among foods were also checked and analyzed with the aforementioned way． With random cluster sampling，1346 people were chosen from Lanzhou city as research subjects，including 330 students from Yuzhong Campus of Lanzhou University．After been told the purpose of this study,all the subjects were asked to finish a questionnaire over something like mutual restraint among food and interrelated knowledge，attitude and dietary behaviors．Then all these data were analyzed with the employing of statistic software—SPSS 16．0． Results： Most literature and books lacked theoretical basis．Books，m